Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Metodología para la rendición de cuentas por resultados en el sector público

Bibliographic Data

ID6165300
AuthorsE Lerner (corresponding author), Emilia Raquel Lerner
Year2021
Issue79
Pages155-190
Publication date2021-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueReforma y democracia (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1315-2378 • E-ISSN: 2443-4620
PublisherCentro Latinoamericano de Administración para el Desarrollo (PUBLISHER • VE)
DOI10.69733/clad.ryd.n79.a225
OpenAlexW4400473970
LanguageES
Citations received1
References cited2

This paper aims to develop a methodology for results-based accountability in public organizations, defining guidelines that support the advance of an accountability process in these organizations. A conceptual framework merging the principles of results-based accountability and the relevant criteria and instruments for its effective development is formulated. The proposal is based on a model that comprises five dimensions focused from the institutional point of view as well as the one of the individuals who are part of the organizations. To validate the methodology, an indicator has been proposed to estimate the level of development of the variables identified in each dimension of the methodology for each country selected in the sample. The proposed methodology was applied to the analysis of eight Latin American countries and two countries in North America. The results show that the highest values of the indicator are verified in those countries that give a higher priority to results-based evaluation, strategic planning, and national development plans in evaluation systems. The main findings indicate that not all Latin American countries have defined results-oriented budgeting and that, when it is defined, the experience is recent. There are also limitations related to the availability and use of information, the integration of systems and inter-institutional coordination, the weakness of the evaluation, self-evaluation and incentives mechanisms, the accountability mechanisms, and the lack of instruments for citizen consultation and social responsability. Given the fact that there is no univocal consensus on the nature of the idea o accountability and its scope, and that there are several ways of using the term, even contradictory ones, the main contribution of this paper for disciplinary development is that it proposes to specify the scope and tools of result-based accountability, wich enabels to delimit its meaning in the institutional framework of each country

Accountability · Business · Conceptual framework · Dimension (graph theory · Economics · Incentive · Latin Americans · Point (geometry · Political science · Process (computing · Process management · Public relations · Sample (material · Scope (computer science · Sociology · Welfare economics · Accounting and Financial Management · Computer Science · Public Administration · Public Policy and Governance · Accounting

  • Análisis de los hallazgos de auditoría de organismos de gobierno y entidades públicas en Chile

    Open Access•Valeria Andrea Orostiga lazo, Felipe Lillo et al.•Reforma y democracia•2025

  • Governance Matters VIII

    Open Access•Daniel Kaufmann, Daniel E Kaufmann et al.•2009

Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae