Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Monstrøsitet som kulturel og religiøs diskurs

Datos Bibliográficos

ID6166162
AutoresLaura Feldt (0000-0002-7264-2542, autor de correspondencia)
Año2003
Número42
Fecha de publicación2003-02-18
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaReligionsvidenskabeligt Tidsskrift (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0108-1993 • E-ISSN: 1904-8181
EditorialDet Kgl. Bibliotek/Royal Danish Library (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.7146/rt.v0i42.1908
OpenAlexW1813819848
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas1
Referencias citadas14

The present contribution attempts to understand and interpret the significance of monstrosity, a well-attested phenomenon in the history of religions. First, monstrosity is interpreted as a mode of cultural discourse pertaining to boundaries and the construction of cultural categories. Its social function is understood along the theories of Girard. The presented view, however, suffers from a lack of adequacy. It neither explains the use of monsters in religious discourses, nor does it indicate why they are often used to bring about transformation and change. In addition to this, it does not offer an explanation for why monsters may be seen as positive and benevolent creatures.Second, the use of monsters in religious discourses is examined and monstrosity is interpreted in relation to Turner’s concept of liminality. The concept, however, is extended to include not only ritual sequences but also spatial and conceptual structures. In religious discourses, monsters can be seen as stigmatized pendlers between this world and ‘the other world’. It is claimed that monsters embody access to the transformative powers of transcendence and may thus be used both to ward off evil and to gain access to benevolence.In the last part of the contribution, these views are illustrated by an analysis of selected narrative and ritual monster traditions from the religions of ancient Mesopotamia. The examples document that monsters are not inherently evil creatures and that it makes sense to understand monsters in relation to boundaries and liminality. In religious discourses, monsters are used to focus on the relationship of humans to transcendence: preserving or obtaining blessing and life and warding off curse and death. Monsters are instruments for gaining access to transcendence, they are embodiments of liminality, and they are used to transform the existing order of things. Monsters dissolve differences and thereby thematize the possibility of change. In this manner, the use of monsters contributes to a questioning of fixed classifications and identities

Aesthetics · Art · Epistemology · Liminality · Literature · Mesopotamia · Monster · Narrative · Phenomenon · Relation (database · Sociology · Transcendence (philosophy · Anthropology · History · Philosophy · Psychedelics and Drug Studies · Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices · Violence, Religion, and Philosophy

  • Religious narrative and the literary fantastic

    Laura Feldt•Religion•2011

  • The ritual process

    Victor Witter Turner•The ritual process•1977

  • Text and figure in ancient Mesopotamia

    Open Access•J N Postgate•Ancient Mind•1994

  • On the Interpretation of the Sumerian Myth “Inanna and Enki”

    Bendt Alster•Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und…•1974

  • The Practice of Everyday Life

    Xin Liu•In One's Own Shadow•2000

  • Introducción a la literatura fantástica

    Tzvetan Todorov•Introducción a la literatura…•1981

  • A Catalogue of Texts and Authors

    W G Lambert•Journal of Cuneiform Studies•1962

  • Clay Figurines of Babylonia and Assyria

    W F Albright, E Douglas Van Buren•Journal of the American Oriental…•1931

  • Mesopotamian Protective Spirits

    Walter Farber, F A M Wiggermann•Journal of the American Oriental…•1996

  • Language, Literature and History

    Brigitte Groneberg, Francesca Rochberg-Halton•Journal of the American Oriental…•1992

  • Aspects Du Rôle Médiateur Des Monstres

    Open Access•David Williams•Studies in Religion/Sciences…•1976

  • Pourquoi les animaux parfaits, les hybrides et les monstres sont-ils bons à penser symboliquement

    Dan Sperber•L Homme•1975

  • The Naturalness of Religious Ideas

    P Boyer, Justin L Barrett•Naturalness of Religious Ideas•1994

  • Frontiers of Utopia

    Louis Marin•Critical Inquiry•1993

Obras citantes distintas1
Citas por año0,07
Intervalo de citas2011 - 2011 (1)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae