Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Survey Methods for Estimating the Size of Weak-Tie Personal Networks

Bibliographic Data

ID6169960
AuthorsDennis M Feehan (0000-0001-7008-4375, Department of Demography, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA, corresponding author), Vo Hai Son (0000-0001-6106-9747, Vietnam Ministry of Health, Nam Tu Liem, Vietnam), Abu Abdul-Quader (0000-0001-7502-3520, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Hanoi, Hanoi, Vietnam)
Year2022
Volume52
Issue2
Pages193-219
Publication date2022-07-05
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSociological Methodology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0081-1750 • E-ISSN: 1467-9531
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/00811750221109568
OpenAlexW4283805033
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited34

Researchers increasingly use aggregate relational data to learn about the size and distribution of survey respondents’ weak-tie personal networks. Aggregate relational data are collected by asking questions about respondents’ connectedness to many different groups (e.g., “How many teachers do you know?”). This approach can be powerful, but to use aggregate relational data, researchers must locate external information about the size of each group from a census or administrative records (e.g., the number of teachers in the population). This need for external information makes aggregate relational data difficult or impossible to collect in many settings. Here, the authors show that relatively simple modifications can overcome this need for external data, significantly increasing the flexibility of the method and weakening key assumptions required by the associated estimators. The key idea is to estimate the size of these groups from the sample of survey respondents, rather than relying on external sources of information. These methods are appropriate for using a sample survey to study the size and distribution of weak-tie network connections. They can also be used as part of the network scale-up method to estimate the size of hidden populations. The authors illustrate this approach with two empirical studies: a large simulation study and original household survey data collected in Hanoi, Vietnam

Aggregate (composite · Aggregate data · Computer security · Data mining · Data science · Econometrics · Estimator · Flexibility (engineering · Key (lock · Population · Relational database · Sample (material · Sample size determination · Social connectedness · Sociology · Statistics · Survey data collection · Survey sampling · Complex Network Analysis Techniques · Computer Science · HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk · Mathematics · Psychology · Social Capital and Networks · Social Psychology

  • From hidden populations to social structure

    Open Access•M J Lubbers, B Volker et al.•Social Networks•2026

  • Uses and limitations of dichotomous aggregate relational data

    Open Access•Derick S Baum, P V Marsden•Social Networks•2023

  • Size estimation of key populations and ‘bridge populations’ based on the network scale-up method in Ukraine

    Open Access•Oksana Kovtun, Volodymyr Paniotto et al.•BMC Public Health•2024

  • A comparison of top-coding strategies for aggregated relational data

    Open Access•J Clay-Warner, Hui Yi et al.•Social Networks•2025

  • The Measurement Properties of Aggregated Relational Data and NSUM-Estimated Network Size

    Open Access•M J Lubbers, Michal Bojanowski et al.•Sociological Methodology•2025

  • Comparing the Robustness of Simple Network Scale-Up Method Estimators

    Open Access•Jessica P Kunke, Ian Laga et al.•Sociological Methodology•2024

  • Advances and innovations in methods for collecting egocentric network data

    Open Access•P V Marsden, Betina Hollstein•Social Science Research•2023

  • Egocentric Network Analysis

    Brea L Perry, Bernice A Pescosolido et al.•Egocentric Network Analysis•2018

  • Model Assisted Survey Sampling

    Open Access•CARL-ERIK SÄRNDAL, Carl‐Erik Särndal et al.•Model Assisted Survey Sampling•1992

  • Stan

    Open Access•Bob Carpenter, Andrew Gelman et al.•Journal of Statistical Software•2017

  • Calibration Estimators in Survey Sampling

    Jean-Claude Deville, Jean‐claude Deville et al.•Journal of the American…•1992

  • How Many People Do You Know?

    Tyler H Mccormick, M J Salganik et al.•Journal of the American…•2010

  • Randomized Response

    Stanley L Warner•Journal of the American…•1965

  • How Many People Do You Know in Prison?

    Tian Zheng, M J Salganik et al.•Journal of the American…•2006

  • Recent Developments in Network Measurement

    Open Access•P V Marsden•Models and Methods in Social…•2005

  • Practical Tools for Designing and Weighting Survey Samples

    Open Access•Richard Valliant, Jill A Dever et al.•Practical Tools for Designing and…•2013

  • Complex Surveys

    Thomas Lumley•Complex Surveys•2010

  • Comparing Two Methods for Estimating Network Size

    C Mccarty, Peter D Killworth et al.•Human Organization•2001

  • A social network approach to estimating seroprevalence in the United States

    Open Access•Peter D Killworth, Eugene C Johnsen et al.•Social Networks•1998

  • The game of contacts

    Open Access•M J Salganik, Maeve B Mello et al.•Social Networks•2010

  • Two interpretations of reports of knowledge of subpopulation sizes

    Open Access•Peter D Killworth, C Mccarty et al.•Social Networks•2003

  • Contacts and influence

    Open Access•Ithiel De Sola Pool, Manfred Kochen•Social Networks•1978

  • Eliciting representative samples of personal networks

    Open Access•C Mccarty, H R Bernard et al.•Social Networks•1997

  • Estimating the size of personal networks

    Open Access•Peter D Killworth, Eugene C Johnsen et al.•Social Networks•1990

  • Using an Online Sample to Estimate the Size of an Offline Population

    Open Access•Dennis M Feehan, Curtiss Cobb•Demography•2019

  • When networks speak volumes

    Open Access•M J Lubbers, J L Molina et al.•Social Networks•2018

  • What Can We Learn with Statistical Truth Serum

    Adam N Glynn, Adam Glynn•Public Opinion Quarterly•2013

  • Statistical Analysis of List Experiments

    Open Access•Graham Blair, Graeme Blair et al.•Political Analysis•2012

  • Generalizing the Network Scale-up Method

    Open Access•Dennis M Feehan, M J Salganik•Sociological Methodology•2016

  • Estimating abortion incidence using the network scale-up method

    Open Access•Elizabeth Sully, Margaret Giorgio et al.•Demographic Research•2020

  • Segregation in Social Networks Based on Acquaintanceship and Trust

    T Diprete, Thomas A Diprete et al.•American Journal of Sociology•2011

  • The Strength of Weak Ties

    Mark Granovetter, Mark S Granovetter•American Journal of Sociology•1973

Unique citing works7
Citations per year2,33
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 7

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae