Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Does Higher Turnout Hurt Incumbents? An Analysis of State Elections in India

Bibliographic Data

ID6170764
AuthorsMilan Vaishnav (0000-0002-7696-125X, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, corresponding author), Johnathan Guy (0000-0002-5959-227X, University of Chicago)
Year2018
Volume6
Issue1
Pages71-87
Publication date2018-04-04
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueStudies in Indian Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2321-0230 • E-ISSN: 2321-7472
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/2321023018762817
OpenAlexW2795659064
LanguageEN
References cited14

Conventional wisdom holds that an increase in voter turnout hurts incumbents in Indian elections. This belief has become a central feature of how analysts discuss Indian voter behaviour. Yet there are few systematic analyses of the relationship between turnout and incumbent performance. To fill this gap, we analysed a dataset of elections in India’s 18 major states between 1980 and 2012. Our analyses show that an increase in turnout, relative to the prior election, has no statistically meaningful relationship with three measures of an incumbent government’s electoral performance. While the belief about the anti-incumbent nature of rising turnout is widely held, it does not appear to be supported by the data

Demographic economics · Economics · Government (linguistics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Public economics · State (computer science · Turnout · Voter turnout · Voting · Computer Science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Politics and Society in Latin America · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Public Administration

  • Does Good Economics Make for Good Politics? Evidence from Indian States

    Milan Vaishnav, Reedy Swanson•India Review•2015

  • The disadvantaged incumbents

    Open Access•Yogesh Uppal•Public Choice•2009

  • Rethinking the partisan effects of higher turnout

    Open Access•B Grofman, Guillermo Owens et al.•Public Choice•1999

  • Why the Poor Vote in India

    Open Access•Amit Ahuja, Pradeep Chhibber•Studies in Comparative…•2012

  • The Politics of Defection

    Subhash C Kashyap•Asian Survey•1970

  • Turnout and Incumbency in Local Elections

    Open Access•Jessica Trounstine•Urban Affairs Review•2013

  • Corruption and the Incumbency Disadvantage

    Marko Klašnja•The Journal of Politics•2015

  • Where Turnout Matters

    Zoltan L Hajnal, Zoltan Hajnal et al.•The Journal of Politics•2005

  • Increasing rents and incumbency disadvantage

    Open Access•Marko Klašnja•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2016

  • A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting

    G Bingham Powell, Guy D Whitten•American Journal of Political…•1993

  • Scaling Down

    Open Access•Richard Snyder•Studies in Comparative…•2001

  • Party systems, political cleavages and electoral volatility in India

    Open Access•Oliver Heath•Electoral Studies•2005

  • Estimating the Electoral Effects of Voter Turnout

    Open Access•Thomas G Hansford, Brad T Gomez•American Political Science Review•2010

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae