Belarusian Nationalism in the 2010s
A Case of Anti-Colonialism? Origins, Features and Outcomes of Ongoing ‘Soft Belarusianisation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6172796 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Anaïs Marin (0000-0002-7392-2714, University of Warsaw, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 27-50 |
| Publication date | 2020-02-17 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Journal of Belarusian Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0075-4161 • E-ISSN: 2052-6512 |
| Publisher | Brill (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.30965/20526512-12340003 |
| OpenAlex | W3008880422 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 4 |
The past decade has seen the emergence of a new type of nationalism in Belarus, a process labelled as ‘soft Belarusianisation’. This trend differs from earlier, mostly top-down (elite-led) episodes of nation-building – the Belarusisation of the 1920s, the nationalists’ movement that followed perestroika, and the ‘Creole nationalism’ incarnated by A. Lukashenko since the mid-1990s. Instead, soft Belarusianisation seems to be a bottom-up process stemming mostly from civil society. It would be wrong to consider it as a traditional revivalist or genuinely grassroots phenomenon however. Yet it appears as an anti-colonialist process, one meant to avoid further assimilation of Belarusians within the Russian whole. Whereas signs of a timid national awakening appeared back in the early 2010s, two sets of factors contributed to shaping and accelerating soft Belarusianisation in recent years. First were exogenous drivers, notably Russia’s annexation of Crimea in 2014. Among the endogenous drivers is the Belarusian authorities’ benevolence towards soft Belarusianisation. Although they can exploit the rally-around-the-flag potential that the process entails for mobilising society in support of independence, the fact that soft Belarusianisation is perceived as anti-Russian in Russia proper creates a challenging situation for them. Should Belarusian nationalism overstep a red line, the likely consequences would be to put Belarusian sovereignty and national identity under a greater threat than it already is now
Annexation · Colonialism · Elite · Frontier · Independence (probability theory · National identity · Nationalism · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Sovereignty · Eastern European Communism and Reforms · European Politics and Security · History · Law · Soviet and Russian History
Belarus in Crisis
Decolonial (Un)coupling from Russia
From Demobilisation to Civic Engagement
Authoritarian Cooptation of Civil Society
Making Sense of a Surprise
Belarus’s oscillating foreign policy toward the EU
Introduction to the Special Issue on Protest and Authoritarian Reaction in Belarus
Soviet music heritage as a discursive middle ground in Belarusian political conflict
Post-Soviet Dependence with Benefits? Critical Geopolitics of Belarus's and Tajikistan's Strategic Alignment with Russia
| Citations per year | 1.8 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Highly cited | No |