Restoring Public Trust in Charities
Empirical Findings and Recommendations
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6173979 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rosemary Teele Langford (0000-0001-5304-3416), Malcolm Anderson (0000-0003-2963-7497) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Publication date | 2023-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | University of New South Wales Law Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0313-0096 • E-ISSN: 1839-2881 |
| Publisher | University of New South Wales Law Journal (PUBLISHER • AU) |
| DOI | 10.53637/awff1066 |
| OpenAlex | W4385135714 |
| Language | EN |
This article reports the results of an extensive survey of persons who govern Australian charities (known as ‘responsible persons’) in relation to governance duties and conflicts of interest. These results are significant in light of the complexity of the legal framework governing Australia’s charities sector and in light of the shortage of empirical research into the sector. The results, combined with comprehensive legal analysis, enable critical evaluation of the overall effectiveness of the governance and regulatory system of charities in Australia, in turn enabling recommendations to ameliorate the difficulties caused by complexity and to facilitate improved governance
Business · Corporate governance · Economic shortage · Empirical research · Government (linguistics · Political science · Project commissioning · Public interest · Public relations · Public sector · Publishing · Relation (database · Law · Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering · Public Administration · Finance
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |