The Innovative Magistrate and Legitimacy
Lessons for a Mobile ‘Solution-Focused’ Model
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6174168 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sarah C Murray (0000-0002-0229-9224), Sarah Murray (0000-0002-8665-0009), Tamara Tulich (0000-0002-6225-8547), Harry Blagg (0000-0002-0432-5756) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Publication date | 2017-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | University of New South Wales Law Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0313-0096 • E-ISSN: 1839-2881 |
| Publisher | University of New South Wales Law Journal (PUBLISHER • AU) |
| DOI | 10.53637/vbrr6293 |
| OpenAlex | W2734591876 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
Australian magistrates face many challenges in their work: heaving courtrooms, unrelenting court lists and cases involving a complex web of legally-knotted psychosocial issues. Innovative practices by a magistrate – creative ways of engaging with defendants, partnering with support services, and novel sentencing methods – can become essential for courtroom survival. Such methods may represent a challenge to the legitimacy, expectations and traditional practice of the wider court of which that magistrate forms a part. However, a failure to seek new solutions can risk the court losing its relevancy
Authorization · Computer security · Face (sociological concept · Legitimacy · Magistrate · Political science · Project commissioning · Public relations · Publishing · Sociology · Work (physics · Computer Science · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Engineering · Law · Law in Society and Culture · Legal Education and Practice Innovations
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |