Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Campaign Money, Congress, and Perceptions of Corruption

Bibliographic Data

ID6179423
AuthorsShaun Bowler (0000-0002-0739-6090, University of California, Riverside), Todd Donovan (0000-0001-6098-5161, Western Washington University, corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume44
Issue2
Pages272-295
Publication date2016-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Politics Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1532-673X • E-ISSN: 1552-3373
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1532673x15594232
OpenAlexW2283709581
LanguageEN
Citations received13
References cited47

Many Americans think campaign money has a corrupting influence on Congress. Yet how they think about money in politics is a relatively unexplored topic. This article investigates how the public reasons about campaign money and corruption. Our survey experiments demonstrate that attitudes about campaign money are structured by partisan interest and are also driven by information about sources of campaign money and the amount spent (particularly for large independent expenditures made possible by Citizens United), the method of delivery, and about what the money is spent on. Mass perceptions about corruption of Congress, furthermore, may reflect aversion to negative campaigns as well as attitudes about campaign financiers having undue influence over representatives. These findings not only provide a more nuanced picture of attitudes about campaign money but also have consequences for how we assess reform proposals relating to money and politics

Campaign finance · Economics · Language change · Perception · Political science · Politics · Public opinion · Public relations · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Fiscal Policies and Political Economy · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Psychology

  • Campaign civility under preferential and plurality voting

    Open Access•Todd Donovan, Caroline Tolbert et al.•Electoral Studies•2016

  • The Appearance of Corruption

    Daron R Shaw, Brian E Roberts et al.•Appearance of Corruption•2021

  • Do congressional candidates benefit from rejecting PAC contributions? Evidence from a pre-registered candidate evaluation survey experiment

    Open Access•Michelangelo Landgrave, Nicholas R Jenkins et al.•Research & Politics•2025

  • Campaign finance and perceptions of interest group influence in Australia

    Open Access•Sarah Cameron, Thomas Wynter•Political Science•2018

  • Does Corruption Follow Opportunity? A Study of the U.S. Congress

    Rodrigo Praino, Adam Graycar•Public Integrity•2018

  • Private electoral finance and democratic theory

    Open Access•Sarah Birch•Constellations•2022

  • Can Interest Groups Improve Democratic Representation? A Citizen Perspective

    Open Access•Marco Lisi•Representation•2024

  • The Donor Went Down to Georgia

    Open Access•Charles Nathan, Arvind Krishnamurthy et al.•Political Behavior•2025

  • Beliefs About Corporate America and the Structure of Opinions Toward Privatization

    Open Access•Mark D Ramirez, Paula Gilbert Lewis et al.•Political Behavior•2018

  • The worthy and the fallible

    Open Access•Danielle May•Party Politics•2025

  • To Know It Is to Loath It

    Open Access•Todd Donovan, Shaun Bowler•American Politics Research•2019

  • The Cost of Political Action Committee Funding

    Open Access•J S K Dudley, Olivia T Neff•The Journal of Race Ethnicity and…•2025

  • How Do Consumers React to Ads That Meddle in Out-Party Primaries

    Open Access•Mohamed A Hussein, Courtney Lee et al.•Journal of Consumer Research•2025

  • The Financiers of Congressional Elections

    Lynda W Powell, Clyde Wilcox et al.•The financiers of congressional…•2003

  • Buckley v. Valeo

    Daniel D Polsby•The Supreme Court Review•1976

  • Congress as Public Enemy

    Open Access•John R Hibbing, Elizabeth Theiss-Morse et al.•Congress As Public Enemy•1995

  • The causes of corruption

    Open Access•Daniel Treisman•Journal of Public Economics•2000

  • Campaign Contributions and Congressional Voting

    Thomas Stratmann•The Review of Economics and…•1995

  • A User's Guide to Campaign Finance Reform

    Open Access•Diana Dwyre•Political Science Quarterly•2003

  • Psychological Bulletin

    Lloyd G Humphreys, Warren S Torgerson et al.•American Psychologist•1965

  • Estimating the Effect of Campaign Spending on Senate Election Outcomes Using Instrumental Variables

    Open Access•Alan S Gerber, Alan Gerber•American Political Science Review•1998

  • Negative, Angry, and Ubiquitous

    Open Access•Erika Franklin Fowler, Travis N Ridout•The Forum•2013

  • Why Politicians Like Electoral Institutions

    Shaun Bowler, Todd Donovan et al.•The Journal of Politics•2006

  • The Effects of Charges of Corruption on Voting Behavior in Congressional Elections, 1982-1990

    Susan Welch, John R Hibbing•The Journal of Politics•1997

  • Unrepresentative Information

    Stephen Ansolabehere, Ansolabehere et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2005

  • Explaining Perceptions of Advertising Tone

    Open Access•Travis N Ridout, Erika Franklin Fowler•Political Research Quarterly•2012

  • Scandals and Congressional Elections in the Post-Watergate Era

    Open Access•Scott J Basinger, Scott Basinger•Political Research Quarterly•2013

  • Examining the Possible Corrosive Impact of Negative Advertising on Citizens' Attitudes toward Politics

    Open Access•Robert A Jackson, Robert Jackson et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2009

  • Good Money and Bad Money

    Open Access•Brad Alexander•Political Research Quarterly•2005

  • Beyond the Running Tally

    Open Access•Larry M Bartels•Political Behavior•2002

  • Does Money Buy Votes? The Case of Self-Financed Gubernatorial Candidates, 1998–2008

    Open Access•Adam R Brown•Political Behavior•2013

  • Politicians, Scandals, and Trust in Government

    Open Access•Shaun Bowler, Jeffrey A Karp•Political Behavior•2004

  • Parties heed (with caution)

    Open Access•Jennifer Vanheerde-Hudson, Jennifer Vanheerde‐hudson et al.•Party Politics•2013

  • Salvation for the Spendthrift Incumbent

    Donald P Green, Jonathan S Krasno•American Journal of Political…•1988

  • The Check Is in the Mail

    Open Access•James G Gimpel, Frances E Lee et al.•American Journal of Political…•2008

  • Democracy and Deceit

    Open Access•Mark E Warren•American Journal of Political…•2006

  • The Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections

    Gary C Jacobson•American Journal of Political…•1990

  • Analyzing Campaign Contributions in Context

    Open Access•Robert C Lowry•American Politics Research•2015

  • Political Corruption as Duplicitous Exclusion

    Mark E Warren•PS Political Science & Politics•2006

  • Political Corruption in the United States

    Open Access•Amitai Etzioni•PS Political Science & Politics•2014

  • The social group dynamics of partisan evaluations

    Open Access•Arthur H Miller, Christopher Wlezien•Electoral Studies•1993

  • Campaign Money and the Press

    Open Access•Frank J Sorauf•Political Science Quarterly•1987

  • Does Campaign Spending Work

    Open Access•Alan S Gerber•American Behavioral Scientist•2004

  • Explaining Senate Election Outcomes

    Open Access•Alan I Abramowitz•American Political Science Review•1988

  • Beyond SES

    Open Access•Henry E Brady, Sidney Verba et al.•American Political Science Review•1995

  • The Effects of Campaign Spending in Congressional Elections

    Open Access•Gary C Jacobson•American Political Science Review•1978

  • Political Corruption in America

    Open Access•John G Peters, Susan Welch•American Political Science Review•1978

  • Determinants of the Outcomes of Midterm Congressional Elections

    Open Access•Edward R Tufte•American Political Science Review•1975

  • Party Affiliation, Partisanship, and Political Beliefs

    Open Access•Alan S Gerber, Gregory A Huber et al.•American Political Science Review•2010

  • Do Negative Campaigns Mobilize or Suppress Turnout? Clarifying the Relationship between Negativity and Participation

    Open Access•Kim Fridkin Kahn, Patrick J Kenney•American Political Science Review•1999

  • Busy Voters, Agenda Control, and the Power of Information

    Open Access•Arthur Lupia•American Political Science Review•1992

Unique citing works13
Citations per year1,3
Citation span2016 - 2025 (10)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 12

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae