Do Political Beliefs Drive Environment Selection
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6180155 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lauren Ratliff Santoro (0000-0002-8914-4507, The University of Texas at Dallas, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 51 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 108-124 |
| Publication date | 2023-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Politics Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1532-673X • E-ISSN: 1552-3373 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1532673x221112394 |
| OpenAlex | W4284881623 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 62 |
Scholars interested in understanding if and to what extent social environments influence individual political behavior are plagued by the reality that individuals construct their social environments. Though there is acknowledgement that this construction is determined by homophily – likes associating with likes – the extent to which political beliefs drive environment selection is yet untested. This paper seeks to understand the extent to which political beliefs inform individuals’ decisions on which social environments to select into. To do so, I follow individuals as they select into social environments across their first year in a university setting – first contacting them before they are embedded in a new social environment, tracking their selections into friendships and groups, and observing how their attitudes change over a year and a half period. Results demonstrate that political beliefs can be significant predictors of selection into non-political social contexts, especially for those with the strongest beliefs about politics
Acknowledgement · Homophily · Political communication · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology
Do bedroom eyes wear political glasses? The role of politics in human mate attraction
The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology
Voter Turnout
Citizens, Politics and Social Communication
Politics with the People
Political Disagreement
The Social Citizen
Uncivil Agreement
With malice toward none and charity for some
Elected in 100 milliseconds
A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization
Human groups and social categories
Talking about Politics
American grace
Ideology
Social Identity Complexity
Anxious Politics
Polarization and Partisan Selective Exposure
Hearing the Other Side
The “unfriending” problem
Reinforcing spirals of political discussion and affective polarization
Ingroup love” and “outgroup hate” in intergroup conflict between natural groups
Identity as Dependent Variable
Is influence mightier than selection? Forging agreement in political discussion networks during a campaign
From Respondents to Networks
The Parties in Our Heads
(Mis)estimating Affective Polarization
How Politics Affects Religion
Political Homophily in Social Relationships
The Workplace as a Context for Cross-Cutting Political Discourse
Through the ideology of the beholder
The Coevolution of Networks and Political Attitudes
Beyond the Running Tally
The Politics of Beauty
Major Life Events and the Age-Partisan Stability Association
The Big Five Personality Traits in the Political Arena
Disagreeing about Disagreement
Of Time and the Development of Partisan Polarization
The Electoral Relevance of Political Talk
Partisanship in a Social Setting
The Incidental Pundit
The Consequences of Cross-Cutting Networks for Political Participation
Party Over Policy
Who is Your Preferred Neighbor? Partisan Residential Preferences and Neighborhood Satisfaction
Politics across Generations
I Disrespectfully Agree
Affect, Not Ideology
The Psychology of Prejudice
Networks, context, and the use of spatially weighted survey metrics
Expressive Partisanship
Social Pressure and Voter Turnout
Is Voting Contagious? Evidence from Two Field Experiments
The Transmission of Political Values from Parent to Child
The Dynamics of the Partisan Gender Gap
Facilitating Communication across Lines of Political Difference
The Social Calculus of Voting
Networks of Political Action
Homophily and Contagion Are Generically Confounded in Observational Social Network Studies
Birds of a Feather
Attrition in Panel Data
Recruitment to High-Risk Activism
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |