Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Independently Validating Ideology Measures

A Look at Nominate and Adjusted ADA Scores

Bibliographic Data

ID6180227
AuthorsBenjamin G Bishin (0000-0001-7465-6860, University of Miami, corresponding author)
Year2003
Volume31
Issue4
Pages404-425
Publication date2003-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Politics Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1532-673X • E-ISSN: 1552-3373
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1532673x03031004004
OpenAlexW2093736167
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited35

Measures of political ideology are central to a broad range of political science scholarship. However, despite extensive evaluation of the relative characteristics of vote-based ideology measures, little scholarship examines their validity independent of legislator behavior. Ideological validity is overlooked because all existing measures are action based. To address this gap, this article applies an instrumental-variables technique called FILTER to assess the validity of two important measures of legislator ideology: NOMINATE and interest-group ratings. The technique is also applied to investigate whether the measured action-based ideology suffers from agenda bias. The results show that the measures produce valid estimates of legislator ideology. Moreover, FILTER offers an important alternative to existing action-based measures of ideology that might be inappropriate for use in some settings, such as when the dependent variable being studied is also action based

Economics · Epistemology · Ideology · Legislation · Legislator · NOMINATE · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Scholarship · Sociology · Statistics · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy · Policy Transfer and Learning · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the U.S. States

    Open Access•William D Berry, Richard C Fording et al.•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2010

  • Mr. Smith and the economy

    Open Access•Edward J Lopez, Carlos D Ramirez et al.•Public Choice•2008

  • Determinants of congressional minimum wage support

    Open Access•J Brian O’Roark, William C Wood•Public Choice•2011

  • Express Yourself (Ideologically)

    Sorelle Gaynor, Kristina Miler et al.•The Journal of Politics•2025

  • The Power of Equality? Polarization and Collective Mis-representation on Gay Rights in Congress, 1989–2019

    Open Access•Benjamin G Bishin, Justin Freebourn et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2021

  • Minority Status, Ideology, or Opportunity

    Open Access•Michael H Murakami•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2009

  • Three Validation Tests of the Shor–McCarty State Legislator Ideology Data

    Open Access•Megan L Remmel, Megan Remmel et al.•American Politics Research•2020

  • Ideology and discontent

    David Ernest Apter•Ideology and discontent•1967

  • The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion

    Open Access•John R Zaller, John Zaller•Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion•1992

  • Ideology, Party, and Voting in the U.S. Congress, 1959–1980

    Open Access•Keith T Poole, R Steven Daniels•American Political Science Review•1985

  • The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics

    Philip E Converse•Politisk Psykologi•2010

  • Policy Voting in the U. S. Senate

    Open Access•Gerald C Wright, Gerald Wright•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1989

  • The R 2 = .93

    Open Access•Thomas L Brunell, William Koetzle et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1999

  • Measuring the Ideologies of U. S. Senators

    Open Access•Barry C Burden, Barry Burden et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2000

  • The Liberal-Conservative Ideology of U.S. Senators

    Kim Quaile Hill, Kim Hill et al.•American Journal of Political…•1997

  • Constituency characteristics and legislative preferences

    Open Access•Keith Krehbiel•Public Choice•1993

  • Rating the Performance of the Ada in the U.S. Congress

    Open Access•William R Shaffer•The Western Political Quarterly•1989

  • Congress

    Open Access•Benjamin I Page•Political Science Quarterly•1975

  • Estimation across Data Sets

    Open Access•Charles H Franklin•Political Analysis•1989

  • The Measurement Characteristics of Congressional Roll-Call Indexes

    Open Access•Eric R A N Smith, Richard Herrera et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1990

  • The People's Choice

    Paul F Lazarsfeld, Bernard Berelson et al.•The People's Choice•1968

  • How Interest Groups Select Issues for Rating Voting Records of Members of the U. S. Congress

    Open Access•Linda L Fowler•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1982

  • Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices

    Open Access•Jeffrey A Segal, Albert D Cover•American Political Science Review•1989

  • Comparing Interest Group Scores across Time and Chambers

    Open Access•Tim Groseclose, Steven D Levitt et al.•American Political Science Review•1999

  • Simulation of Public Opinion

    David Seidman•Public Opinion Quarterly•1975

  • An Algorithm for Estimating Turnout as a Guide to Predicting Elections

    John R Petrocik•Public Opinion Quarterly•1991

  • Estimating Legislators' Preferred Points

    Open Access•John Londregan•Political Analysis•1999

  • The Potential Electoral Disadvantages of a Catch-All Party

    Open Access•B Grofman, Samuel Merrill et al.•Party Politics•1999

  • Can We Learn the Causes of Congressional Decisions from Roll-Call Data

    Open Access•Peter M Vandoren, Peter Vandoren•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1990

  • Artificial Extremism in Interest Group Ratings

    Open Access•Jane Mcintosh Snyder, James M Snyder•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1992

  • Constituency Influence in Congress

    Open Access•Benjamin G Bishin•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2000

  • Legislative Politics in Authoritarian Brazil

    Open Access•Scott W Desposato, Scott Desposato•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2001

  • Artificial Extremism in Interest Group Ratings and the Preferences versus Party Debate

    Open Access•Michael C Herron•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1999

  • A Spatial Model for Legislative Roll Call Analysis

    Keith T Poole, Howard Rosenthal et al.•American Journal of Political…•1985

  • Ideology, Interest Group Scores, and Legislative Votes

    J E Jackson, John W Kingdon•American Journal of Political…•1992

  • Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix

    Donald T Campbell, Donald W Fiske•Psychological Bulletin•1959

  • The Committee Assignment Process and the Conditional Nature of Committee Bias

    Open Access•Richard L Hall, Richard Hall et al.•American Political Science Review•1990

  • A Method of Estimating the Personal Ideology of Political Representatives

    Open Access•Richard T Carson, Joe Oppenheimer et al.•American Political Science Review•1984

  • Public Goods, Private Interests, and Representation

    Open Access•J E Jackson, David C King•American Political Science Review•1989

Unique citing works7
Citations per year0,39
Citation span2008 - 2025 (18)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 7

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae