Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Acclimation Effects and the Chief Justice

The Influence of Tenure and Role on the Decisional Behavior of the Court’s Leader, 1888-2007

Bibliographic Data

ID6180238
AuthorsDrew Noble Lanier (0009-0005-5245-069X, University of Central Florida, corresponding author)
Year2011
Volume39
Issue4
Pages682-723
Publication date2011-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Politics Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1532-673X • E-ISSN: 1552-3373
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1532673x11401813
OpenAlexW3121561834
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited77

Under the acclimation effect view, recent appointees to the Court modify their behavior in systematic ways early in their tenure as opposed to their later decisional tendencies. Similarly, many studies have examined the chief justice’s unique behavior.This study blends these two rich strands and explores whether chief justices demonstrate an acclimation effect, such that their behavior changes systematically through time. Using more than a century of Court data, this study examines whether new chief justices’ concurrence and dissent rates decline and whether they write fewer individual opinions gradually. I find that the chief justice’s position serves to create an incentive structure that is uniquely associated with declining rates of specially concurring and dissenting votes in certain cases. Also, new chief justices pen fewer special concurrences and dissents in some policy areas. My results hence imply that the chief justice experiences unique acclimation effects in learning to marshal the Court

Dissent · Dissenting opinion · Economic Justice · Economics · Incentive · Majority opinion · Political science · Supreme court · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Legal and Constitutional Studies

  • Post-communist Chief Justices in Slovakia

    Open Access•David Kosař, Samuel Spáč•Hague Journal on the Rule of Law•2021

  • Chief Justices, Consensus, and Policy Cohesion

    Open Access•Drew Noble Lanier, Mark S Hurwitz•Social Science Quarterly•2026

  • Promotion, Social Identity, and Decision Making in the United States Courts of Appeals

    Open Access•Jeffrey Budziak•Journal of Law and Courts•2016

  • Equation Balance and Dynamic Political Modeling

    Open Access•Matthew J Lebo, Taylor Grant et al.•Political Analysis•2016

  • The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited

    Open Access•Jeffrey A Segal, Harold J Spaeth•Supreme Court and the Attitudinal…•2002

  • The Puzzle of Judicial Behavior

    Lawrence Baum•The puzzle of judicial behavior•1997

  • Long memory relationships and the aggregation of dynamic models

    Open Access•Clive W J Granger•Journal of Econometrics•1980

  • Spurious regressions in econometrics

    Open Access•Clive W J Granger, Paul Newbold•Journal of Econometrics•1974

  • The Roosevelt Court

    C Herman Pritchett•Michigan Law Review•1948

  • Gaussian Semiparametric Estimation of Long Range Dependence

    Peter M Robinson•The Annals of Statistics•1995

  • Institutional Legitimacy, Policy Legitimacy, and the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Jeffery J Mondak•American Politics Quarterly•1992

  • Fractional differencing

    J R M HOSKING•Biometrika•1981

  • A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity

    Halbert White•Econometrica•1980

  • Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root

    Open Access•Denis Kwiatkowski, Peter C B Phillips et al.•Journal of Econometrics•1992

  • The Judicial Mind Revisited

    Glendon Schubert•The Judicial Mind Revisited•1975

  • Social science history

    Jeremy Baskes•Staying Afloat•2020

  • Concurring Opinion Writing on the U.S. Supreme Court

    Pamela C Corley, Pamela Corley•Concurring Opinion Writing on the…•2010

  • The Supreme Court as a Small Group

    E C Snyder, Elizabeth Snyder•Social Forces•1958

  • I Respectfully Dissent

    Open Access•Mark S Hurwitz, Drew Noble Lanier•Review of Policy Research•2004

  • Nuisance vs. Substance

    Open Access•Niels Beck, Nathaniel Beck et al.•Political Analysis•1996

  • Storm Center

    Patricia M Wald, Dai O’brien et al.•Journal of Policy Analysis and…•1988

  • The Supreme Court, 1888–1940

    Open Access•Sandra L Wood, Linda Camp Keith et al.•Social Science History•1998

  • Strategic Choice and Opinion Assignment on the U. S. Supreme Court

    Saul Brenner•The Western Political Quarterly•1982

  • Harlan Fiske Stone

    John P Frank, Alpheus Thomas Mason•Stanford Law Review•1957

  • Chief Justice

    David Wigdor, Robert J Steamer•Journal of American History•1988

  • The Quixotic Search for Consensus on the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Scott D Gerber, Keeok Park•American Political Science Review•1997

  • Personal Attribute Models of the Voting Behavior of U.S. Supreme Court Justices

    Open Access•C Neal Tate•American Political Science Review•1981

  • Change over Tenure

    Open Access•Erin B Kaheny, Susan B Haire et al.•American Journal of Political…•2008

  • Leadership and Consensus on the U.S. Supreme Court

    Stacia L Haynie•The Journal of Politics•1992

  • Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999

    Open Access•A D Martins, Andrew D Martin et al.•Political Analysis•2002

  • Divisions of Opinion Among Justices of the U. S. Supreme Court, 1939–1941

    Open Access•C Herman Pritchett•American Political Science Review•1941

  • Issue Fluidity on the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Kevin T Mcguire, Barbara Palmer•American Political Science Review•1995

  • Measuring Policy Change in the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Lawrence Baum•American Political Science Review•1988

  • On the Mysterious Demise of Consensual Norms in the United States Supreme Court

    Thomas G Walker, Tom Walker et al.•The Journal of Politics•1988

  • Reexamining the Growth of the Institutional Presidency, 1940–2000

    Matthew J Dickinson, Matthew Dickinson et al.•The Journal of Politics•2007

  • Courting the Public

    James R Zink, James F Spriggs et al.•The Journal of Politics•2009

  • Bloc Voting and The Freshman Justice Revisited

    Edward V Heck, Melinda Gann Hall•The Journal of Politics•1981

  • Judicial Career Patterns and Majority Opinion Assignment on the Supreme Court

    Elliot E Slotnick•The Journal of Politics•1979

  • Dissent in American Courts

    A Peterson, Steven A Peterson•The Journal of Politics•1981

  • Integrated Models of Judicial Dissent

    Paul Brace, Melinda Gann Hall•The Journal of Politics•1993

  • Public Opinion, the Attitudinal Model, and Supreme Court Decision Making

    William Mishler, Reginald S Sheehan•The Journal of Politics•1996

  • Dissent Behavior and the Social Background of Supreme Court Justices

    Sidney Ulmer, S Sidney Ulmer•The Journal of Politics•1970

  • Membership Change and Collective Voting Change in the United States Supreme Court

    Lawrence Baum•The Journal of Politics•1992

  • Another Look at Freshman Indecisiveness on the United States Supreme Court

    Saul Brenner•Polity•1983

  • Acclimation and Attitudes

    Open Access•Mark S Hurwitz, Oseph V Stefko•Political Research Quarterly•2004

  • Opinion writing and acclimation effect

    Open Access•Saul Brenner, Timothy M Hagle•Political Behavior•1996

  • Of Time and Consensual Norms in the Supreme Court

    Gregory A Calderia, Christopher J W Zorn et al.•American Journal of Political…•1998

  • Strategic Party Government

    Open Access•Matthew J Lebo, Adam Mcglynn et al.•American Journal of Political…•2007

  • Who Speaks for the Court? Majority Opinion Assignment from Taft to Burger

    Elliot E Slotnick•American Journal of Political…•1979

  • Dynamic Conditional Correlations in Political Science

    Open Access•Matthew J Lebo, J M Box-Steffensmeier et al.•American Journal of Political…•2008

  • Time Binding and Theory Building in Personal Attribute Models of Supreme Court Voting Behavior, 1916-88

    C Neal Tate, Roger Handberg•American Journal of Political…•1991

  • "Acclimation Effects" for Supreme Court Justices

    Sandra L Wood, Linda Camp Keith et al.•American Journal of Political…•1998

  • Investigating Political Dynamics Using Fractional Integration Methods

    J M Box-Steffensmeier, Renée M Smith•American Journal of Political…•1998

  • "Freshman Effects" for Supreme Court Justices

    Timothy M Hagle•American Journal of Political…•1993

  • May It Please the Chief? Opinion Assignments in the Rehnquist Court

    Forrest Maltzman, Paul J Wahlbeck•American Journal of Political…•1996

  • Near-Integrated Data and the Analysis of Political Relationships

    Suzanna Deboef, Jim Granato•American Journal of Political…•1997

  • The Public and the Supreme Court

    Roy B Flemming, B Dan Wood•American Journal of Political…•1997

  • Fractional (Co)integration and Governing Party Support in Britain

    Open Access•Harold D Clarke, Matthew J Lebo et al.•British Journal of Political…•2003

  • Disagreement on the Rehnquist Court

    Open Access•Lori Beth Way, Charles C Turner•American Politics Research•2006

  • Fractional integration methods in political science

    Open Access•J M Box-Steffensmeier, Andrew R Tomlinson•Electoral Studies•2000

  • What To Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data

    Open Access•Niels Beck, Nathaniel Beck et al.•American Political Science Review•1995

  • You must remember this

    Open Access•Matthew J Lebo, Robert Walker et al.•Electoral Studies•2000

  • The Chief Justices and Self-Assignment of Majority Opinions

    Elliot E Slotnick•The Western Political Quarterly•1978

  • Separation-of-Powers Games in the Positive Theory of Congress and Courts

    Open Access•Jeffrey A Segal•American Political Science Review•1997

  • Issue Specialization in Majority Opinion Assignment On the Burger Court

    Saul Brenner, Harold J Spaeth•The Western Political Quarterly•1986

  • The 1960 Term of the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Glendon Schubert•American Political Science Review•1962

  • Research Note

    Open Access•William P Mclauchlan•The Western Political Quarterly•1972

Unique citing works4
Citations per year0,4
Citation span2016 - 2026 (11)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae