Evaluating the Quality of Changes in Voter Registration Databases
Part of Special Symposium on Election Sciences
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6180288 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Seo-Young Silvia Kim (0000-0002-8801-9210, California Institute of Technology, corresponding author), Spencer Schneider (California Institute of Technology), R Michael Alvarez (0000-0002-8113-4451, California Institute of Technology) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 670-676 |
| Publication date | 2020-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Politics Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1532-673X • E-ISSN: 1552-3373 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1532673x19870512 |
| OpenAlex | W3049363133 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 8 |
The administration of elections depends crucially upon the quality and integrity of voter registration databases. In addition, political scientists are increasingly using these databases in their research. However, these databases are dynamic and may be subject to external manipulation and unintentional errors. In this article, using data from Orange County, California, we develop two methods for evaluating the quality of voter registration data as it changes over time: (a) generating audit data by repeated record linkage across periodic snapshots of a given database and monitoring it for sudden anomalous changes and (b) identifying duplicates via an efficient, automated duplicate detection, and tracking new duplicates and deduplication efforts over time. We show that the generated data can serve not only to evaluate voter file quality and election integrity but also as a novel source of data on election administration practices
Audit · Business · Data deduplication · Data mining · Data quality · Database · Political science · Politics · Record linkage · Voter registration · Voting · Computer Science · Data Quality and Management · Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting · Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data · Accounting
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2023 (2) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |