Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Putin’s first year in office

The new regime’s uniqueness in Russian history

Bibliographic Data

ID6180728
AuthorsShlapentokh, Vladimir Shlapentokh (Michigan State University, corresponding author)
Year2001
Volume34
Issue4
Pages371-399
Publication date2001-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCommunist and Post-Communist Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0967-067X • E-ISSN: 1873-6920
PublisherUniversity of California Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1016/s0967-067x(01)00019-8
OpenAlexW1979341074
LanguageEN
Citations received7

The author analyzes Putin’s first year in office by comparing it to the last fifteen regimes in Russian history. Putin shares many common features with the leaders of the past. He belongs to the group of leaders who were not so concerned about the progress of society as in removing the threat to the existing political order. He is also among those who moved toward authoritarianism in their first year. As all new regimes in the 20th centuries, Putin used democratic ideology for the legitimization of his rule, though he almost immediately began to curtail the fledgling democracy in Russia. While Putin’s regime was similar to the previous regimes in some respects, it was very different in others. First of all, no ruler rose to power from such a politically obscure position. Putin came to power with far less experience than his fourteen predecessors. The circumstances under which Putin came to power have no precedent in recent history. Another uniqueness of Putin’s first year in office was the extent to which various elements of the old regime were preserved. The author dwells on Putin’s first year with special attention. As a predictor of the future, it suggests that Russian society under Putin will remain essentially the same as it was shaped by 1995

Authoritarianism · Democracy · Economic history · Economics · Great power · Ideology · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Ruler · Russian history · Sociology · Uniqueness · History · Law · Russia and Soviet political economy

  • State >Legitimacy and the (In)significance of Democracy in Post‐Communist Russia

    Rounak Sil, Cheng Chen•Europe Asia Studies•2004

  • The End of “Putin’s Empire?” Ontological Problems of Russian Imperialism in the Context of the War against Ukraine, 2022

    Ruslan Zaporozhchenko•Problems of Post-Communism•2023

  • A ‘Risky Westward Turn’? Putin's 9–11 Script and Ordinary Russians

    John O''Loughlin, John Ο’loughlin et al.•Europe Asia Studies•2004

  • L a soutenabilité du développement en R ussie durant la décennie 1998-2008

    Louis Dupuy•Revue d’études comparatives…•2015

  • La soutenabilité du développement en Russie durant la décennie 1998-2008

    Louis Dupuy•Revue d’études comparatives…•2015

  • A ‘Baltic Republic in the Russian Federation’ or the ‘Fourth Baltic Republic’? Kaliningrad's regional programme in the 1990s

    Paul Holtom•Journal of Baltic Studies•2003

  • Russian geopolitical storylines and public opinion in the wake of 9–11

    Open Access•John Ο’loughlin, John O’loughlin et al.•Communist and Post-Communist…•2004

Unique citing works7
Citations per year0,3
Citation span2003 - 2023 (21)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae