Agriculture and sustainable communities

Reflections from a comparative case study

Datos Bibliográficos

ID6181883
AutoresJungho Suh (0000-0002-9580-6327)
Año2018
Volumen49
Número1
Páginas34-49
Fecha de publicación2018-01-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaCommunity Development (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1557-5330 • E-ISSN: 1944-7485
EditorialInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/15575330.2017.1388264
OpenAlexW2765251422
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas2
Referencias citadas20

The ecovillage movement places emphasis on the holistic sustainability of living. This study undertakes a comparative analysis of two forms of ecovillage development: establishing new intentional communities and retrofitting existing traditional villages. This article describes the achievements and limitations of intentional communities, with a special reference to the Findhorn Ecovillage in Scotland, Crystal Waters in Australia, and Ecovillage at Ithaca (EVI) in the US. For comparison purposes, this article introduces Mundang Ecovillage, a traditional village located in South Korea. The three intentional communities have given priority to building low-impact housing and relying on renewable energy sources. Mundang Ecovillage has strengths in the aspects of agricultural sustainability and social cohesion. This study posits that collective and cooperative communal work on organic farms generates social interactions and enhances integrity among community members. Thus, a great deal of synergy can be generated from the co-development of traditional and intentional communities

Agriculture · Business · Comparative case · Economic geography · Economic growth · Economics · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Political science · Regional science · Sociology · Sustainable agriculture · Environmental, Ecological, and Cultural Studies · Organic Food and Agriculture · Urban Agriculture and Sustainability