Attitude toward innovation and its implications for rural community development in Mexican peasant organizations

Bibliographic Data

ID6182004
AuthorsAna L Burgos (0000-0002-0666-4161), Octavio T Barrera-Perales (0000-0001-7880-041X)
Year2024
Volume55
Issue5
Pages689-710
Publication date2024-09-02
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueCommunity Development (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1557-5330 • E-ISSN: 1944-7485
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/15575330.2023.2255997
OpenAlexW4386541338
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited57

Resistance to change and a negative attitude toward innovation (ATI) are attributes often associated to rural communities. Studies on rural ATI focus on technological adoption, but sociopsychological aspects are little explored. This article identifies the factors influencing the ATI in Mexican peasant organizations, using a systemic model with an individual sphere (affective and cognitive components), a social sphere (social capital, information, cultural values) and a territorial sphere. A semi-structured questionnaire was applied to 123 members of six peasants organizations in a tropical region. In the individual sphere, results showed a balance between affective and cognitive components. In the social sphere, high social capital and good information access promote a positive ATI, while cultural values do not appear as relevant barriers. Practical implications include the stigmatization eradication of rural communities as non-innovative, and their recognition as sensitive subjects building their ATI facing risks in adverse territorial contexts.KEYWORDS: Rural community developmentattitude to innovationrural innovationcommunity environmenttransdisciplinary research AcknowledgmentsThis study was part of the project "Toward rural innovation in forgotten territories: a transdisciplinary approach in the Bajo Balsas (Michoacan)" financed by the National Council of Science and Technology of Mexico (CONACYT; PN2017/5435). The elaboration of this paper was supported by the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) under the General Directorate of Academic Personnel (DGAPA), with a sabbatical and postdoctoral scholarships for Ana L. Burgos and Octavio T. Barrera-Perales, respectively. The authors thank Balsas Group A.C, ejidos El Baral and Juntas de Poturo, and cooperatives Capirito-Las Anonas, Guadalupe de Oropeo, Nuevo Oropeo and Pescadores de Oropeo in the Municipalities of La Huacana and Churumuco (Michoacán) that actively participated in the project. Rosaura Páez-Bistrain contributed greatly to the co-design and implementation of participatory activities.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThe work was supported by the National Council of Science and Technology of Mexico (CONACYT) [PN2017/5435]; General Directorate of Academic Personnel (DGAPA) of the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) [Sabbatical and postdoctoral scholarships

Economic growth · Economics · Peasant · Political science · Rural community · Social capital · Social science · Socioeconomics · Sociology · Community Health and Development · Environmental Education and Sustainability · Innovation and Socioeconomic Development

Tools

Open DOI