Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Congressional Career Decisions in the 2018 Congressional Midterm Elections

Bibliographic Data

ID6182318
AuthorsHanna K Brant (0000-0001-9604-8241, University of Missouri Columbia, Columbia, Missouri, corresponding author), L Marvin Overby (University of Missouri Columbia, Columbia, Missouri)
Year2021
Volume48
Issue1
Pages8-24
Publication date2021-01-02
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueCongress & the Presidency (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0734-3469 • E-ISSN: 1944-1053
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/07343469.2020.1811424
OpenAlexW3138467222
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited35

Although we prefer to think of congressional turnover as being electorally driven and based on the choices of voters, in recent decades retirements/resignations have been a larger contributor to change in the composition of both chambers of Congress than have electoral defeats of incumbents. In this article, we consider the impact of retirements (and other forms of non-electoral exits) on the 2018 congressional midterms, focusing primarily on the House of Representatives. After reviewing the relevant (and limited) literature, we provide a descriptive overview of congressional retirements (including the unusual retirement of a comparatively young speaker of the House and almost two dozen GOP committee and subcommittee chairs) then examine the extent of voluntary retirements in this electoral cycle against historical patterns, and explore the effects of different retirements (i.e., progressive ambition versus retirement from public life). Using multivariate models, we examine which factors correlate significantly with retirement decisions, test for a partisan differential in retirement rates, and compare the rates at which the parties are capable of replacing retirees with co-partisans. Our analysis allows us to consider the ongoing importance of members’ career decisions for the composition of and the partisan balance of power in the U. S. Congress. Within the context of 2018 specifically, these career decisions had substantial implications for partisan control of the House, experience and leadership within the House Republican conference, and entrance of female members into Congress and toward higher office

Balance (ability · Context (archaeology · Control (management · Demographic economics · Economics · House of Representatives · Management · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Test (biology · Turnover · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Gender Politics and Representation · Law · Psychology · Public Administration · Social Policy and Reform Studies

  • Institutional Attachments and Patterns of Ambition in State Legislatures

    Open Access•Bethany Bowra, Todd Makse•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2023

  • Congressional careers

    John R Hibbing•Congressional careers•1991

  • Women on the Run

    Open Access•Danny Hayes, Jennifer L Lawle et al.•Women on the Run•2016

  • It Takes a Candidate

    Open Access•Jennifer L Lawle, Jennifer L Lawless et al.•It Takes a Candidate•2001

  • A Dynamic Model of Loss, Retirement, and Tenure in the U.S. House of Representatives

    John B Gilmour, Paul Rothstein et al.•The Journal of Politics•1996

  • Insecure Majorities

    Frances E Lee, Frances Lee•Insecure Majorities•2016

  • Voluntary Retirement from the U.S. House of Representatives

    John R Hibbing•American Journal of Political…•1982

  • Congress, The Electoral Connection

    Michael J Ross, David R Mayhew•The Western Political Quarterly•1975

  • Joining the Great Majority

    Open Access•Hanna K Brant, Theodore J Masthay et al.•Social Science Quarterly•2018

  • Congress

    Open Access•Benjamin I Page•Political Science Quarterly•1975

  • Becoming a Candidate

    Open Access•Samuel H Fisher•Political Science Quarterly•2013

  • Incumbency Reconsidered

    Walter J Stone, Sarah A Fulton et al.•The Journal of Politics•2010

  • What It Takes to Win

    Kathryn Pearson, Eric Mcghee•Politics & Gender•2013

  • Nationalization and the Incumbency Advantage

    Open Access•Jamie L Carson, James Sievert et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2019

  • Avarice and Ambition in Congress

    Open Access•Richard L Hall, Richard Hall et al.•American Political Science Review•1995

  • It’s Nothing Personal

    Gary C Jacobson•The Journal of Politics•2015

  • Why Aren't There More Republican Women in Congress? Gender, Partisanship, and Fundraising Support in the 2010 and 2012 Elections

    Open Access•Karin E Kitchens, Michele L Swers•Politics & Gender•2016

  • Calling It Quits

    Open Access•Christopher D Raymond, L Marvin Overby•Political Studies•2020

  • A Bicameral Perspective on Legislative Retirement

    Open Access•Jeffrey L Bernstein, Jennifer Wolak•Political Research Quarterly•2002

  • Dynamics of Senate Retirements

    Open Access•Theodore J Masthay, L Marvin Overby•Political Research Quarterly•2017

  • It's Not You, It's Me

    Open Access•Matthew Kerby, Kelly Blidook•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2011

  • Early Republican Retirement

    Open Access•John B Gilmour, Paul Rothstein et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1993

  • Reexamining Theories of Congressional Retirement

    Open Access•Steven Livingston, Steven G Livingston et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1993

  • Strategic Retirements

    Open Access•Jennifer Wolak•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2007

  • Minority Status, Ideology, or Opportunity

    Open Access•Michael H Murakami•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2009

  • Abandoning Ankara

    Tevfik Murat Yildirim, L Marvin Overby•Journal of Legislative Studies•2019

  • Retirements, Retentions, and the Balance of Partisan Power in Contemporary Congressional Politics

    Adrian Ang, Adrian U-Jin Ang et al.•Journal of Legislative Studies•2008

  • The Electoral Consequences of Corruption

    Catherine E De Vries, Hector Solaz•Annual Review of Political Science•2017

  • Is Serving in Congress Fun Again? Voluntary Retirements from the House since the 1970s

    Michael K Moore, John R Hibbing•American Journal of Political…•1992

  • Making the Most of Statistical Analyses

    Gary King, Michael Tomz et al.•American Journal of Political…•2000

  • Golden Parachutes, Rubber Checks, and Strategic Retirements from the 102d House

    Timothy Groseclose, Keith Krehbiel•American Journal of Political…•1994

  • Strategy and Choice in the 1982 Congressional Elections

    Gary C Jacobson, Samuel Kernell•PS Political Science & Politics•1982

  • Voluntary Retirement, Incumbency, and the Modern House

    Open Access•Joseph Cooper, William West•Political Science Quarterly•1981

  • An Analysis of Congressional Career Decisions, 1947-1986

    Open Access•D Roderick Kiewiet, Langche Zeng•American Political Science Review•1993

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,33
Citation span2023 - 2023 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae