Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Consensus, Conflict, and Partisanship in House Decision Making

A Bill-Level Examination of Committee and Floor Behavior

Bibliographic Data

ID6182335
AuthorsJamie L Carson (0000-0002-0083-5206, University of Georgia), Charles J Finocchiaro (0000-0003-1851-3990, University of South Carolina), David W Rohde (0000-0002-0661-6266, Duke University)
Year2010
Volume37
Issue3
Pages231-253
Publication date2010-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueCongress & the Presidency (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0734-3469 • E-ISSN: 1944-1053
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/07343469.2010.486393
OpenAlexW2098321601
LanguageEN
Citations received11
References cited49

Although conflict and partisanship are deeply entrenched in the public's view of the U.S. Congress, political scientists have noted that consensus characterizes much of the legislative branch's operations. We build on an expanding literature that moves beyond a focus on roll call voting and explore individual bills as the unit of analysis in an attempt to obtain an accurate picture of the broader context in which House decision making occurs. Drawing on evidence spanning 24 years, we document the extent to which consensus rather than conflict typifies House decision making. Our bill-level analysis facilitates a unique examination of the context in which committees operate as well as the ensuing floor environment. The results provide insight into the factors attending to the degree of consensus and conflict associated with bills—particularly the salience of the issue and the committee of origin—while painting a more complete picture of the day-to-day environment of the U.S. House

Context (archaeology · House of Representatives · Legislature · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Roll call · Salience (neuroscience · Sociology · Voting · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Fiscal Policies and Political Economy · History · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Psychology · Public Administration

  • Congress and the Politics of Problem Solving

    Open Access•E Scott Adler, John D Wilkerson et al.•Congress and the Politics of…•2013

  • Who Controls the Legislative Process? Party Cartels, Committee Gatekeepers, and Subcommittee Activity in the South Korean National Assembly

    Open Access•Sunwoo Kwak, Eunmi Cho et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2026

  • Incorporation is Not Enough

    Open Access•P C Peay•The Journal of Race Ethnicity and…•2021

  • The Partisanship of House Committees and Member Self‐Selection

    Open Access•James M Ryan•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2020

  • Recentralizing the U.S. House Appropriations Process, 1919–20

    Gregory L Bovitz, Jamie L Carson et al.•Historical Methods A Journal of…•2012

  • Measuring variations in party unity voting

    Open Access•Michael H Crespin, David W Rohde et al.•Party Politics•2013

  • War for the Floor

    Open Access•Charles J Finocchiaro, David W Rohde•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2008

  • Reflections on the Practice of Theorizing

    David W Rohde•The Journal of Politics•2013

  • Bypassing Congressional Committees

    Open Access•William Bendix•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2016

  • Policy and the structure of roll call voting in the US house

    Open Access•Scott De Marchi, Spencer Dorsey et al.•Journal of Public Policy•2021

  • Minorities at the gate

    Paula Clerici•Journal of Legislative Studies•2020

  • Positive Theories of Congressional Institutions

    Kenneth Shepsle, Barry Weingast•Positive theories of congressional…•1995

  • Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House

    David W Rohde•Parties and leaders in the…•1991

  • Issue Politics in Congress

    Open Access•Tracy Sulkin•Issue politics in Congress•2005

  • Party Polarization in Congress

    Open Access•Sean M Theriault•Party Polarization in Congress•2008

  • Committees in Congress

    Christopher J Deering, Christopher Deering et al.•Committees in Congress•1997

  • Setting the Agenda

    Open Access•Gary W Cox, Mathew D Mccubbins•Setting the Agenda•2005

  • Information and Legislative Organization

    Keith Krehbiel•Information and Legislative…•1991

  • Why Parties?

    John H Aldrich•Why Parties?•1995

  • Legislative Entrepreneurship in the U.S. House of Representatives

    Gregory J Wawro, Gregory Wawro•Legislative Entrepreneurship in…•2000

  • Veto Bargaining

    Open Access•Charles M Cameron•Veto Bargaining•2000

  • Party Influence in Congress

    Open Access•Stephanie S Smith, Steven S Smith•Party Influence in Congress•2007

  • Clarify

    Open Access•Michael Tomz, Jason Wittenberg et al.•Journal of Statistical Software•2003

  • Divided we govern

    David R Mayhew•Divided we govern•1991

  • Home Style

    Richard F Fenno•Home Style•1978

  • Pivotal Politics

    Keith Krehbiel•Pivotal Politics•1998

  • Procedural Contexts, Party Strategy, and Conditional Party Voting in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1971–2000

    Open Access•Jason M Roberts, Stephanie S Smith et al.•American Journal of Political…•2003

  • Constituency Cleavages and Congressional Parties

    Open Access•J A Jenkins, Eric Schickler et al.•Social Science History•2004

  • Constituency Cleavages and Congressional Parties

    J A Jenkins•Social Science History•2004

  • Viva Voce

    Open Access•Michael S Lynch, Anthony J Madonna•Social Science Quarterly•2013

  • Congress

    Open Access•Benjamin I Page•Political Science Quarterly•1975

  • The Industrial Organization of Congress; or, Why Legislatures, Like Firms, Are Not Organized as Markets

    Barry R Weingast, William Marshall et al.•Journal of Political Economy•1988

  • Meeting Competing Demands

    Forrest Maltzman•American Journal of Political…•1995

  • Cosponsorship in the U. S. Congress

    Open Access•Rick K Wilson, Cheryl D Young•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1997

  • Position Taking and Cosponsorship in the U.S. House

    Open Access•Gregory Koger•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2003

  • In Search of Killer Amendments In the Modern U.S. House

    Open Access•Charles J Finocchiaro, J A Jenkins•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2008

  • One Bill, Many Committees

    Open Access•Roger H Davidson, Roger Davidson et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1988

  • The Keys to Legislative Success in the U.S. House of Representatives

    Open Access•William D Anderson, J M Box-Steffensmeier et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2003

  • War for the Floor

    Open Access•Charles J Finocchiaro, David W Rohde•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2008

  • Issues and Institutions

    Open Access•Glen S Krutz, Glen Krutz•American Journal of Political…•2005

  • Universalism and the Parties in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1921-80

    Melissa P Collie•American Journal of Political…•1988

  • Unorthodox lawmaking

    Barbara Sinclair•Unorthodox lawmaking•2017

  • American Business, Public Policy, Case-Studies, and Political Theory

    Open Access•Theodore J Lowi•World Politics•1964

  • Sincere Versus Sophisticated Voting in Congress

    Tim Groseclose, Jeffrey Milyo•The Journal of Politics•2010

  • The Republican Revolution and the House Appropriations Committee

    John H Aldrich, David W Rohde•The Journal of Politics•2000

  • The Politics of Attention

    Open Access•Paul E Johnson•Perspectives on Politics•2006

  • Parties and Committees in the House

    Open Access•David W Rohde•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1994

  • Comparing Committee and Floor Preferences

    Open Access•John Londregan, Jane Mcintosh Snyder et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1994

  • Positive Theories of Congressional Institutions

    Open Access•Kenneth A Shepsle, Barry R Weingast•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1994

  • Divided Government and the Legislative Productivity of Congress, 1945-94

    Open Access•William Howells, William G Howell et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2000

  • The Statistical Analysis Of Roll‐Call Data

    Open Access•Jason M Roberts•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2007

  • Tactical Maneuvering on Omnibus Bills in Congress

    Glen S Krutz, Glen Krutz•American Journal of Political…•2001

  • Constituency Characteristics and the "Guardian" Model of Appropriations Subcommittees, 1959-1998

    E Scott Adler•American Journal of Political…•2000

  • Making the Most of Statistical Analyses

    Gary King, Michael Tomz et al.•American Journal of Political…•2000

  • A Rational Choice Perspective on Congressional Norms

    Barry R Weingast•American Journal of Political…•1979

  • Partisanship, Consensus, and Committee-Floor Divergence

    Open Access•Jamie L Carson, Charles J Finocchiaro et al.•American Politics Research•2002

  • Dynamic Representation

    Open Access•James A Stimson, James Stimson et al.•American Political Science Review•1995

  • Distributive and Partisan Issues in Agriculture Policy in the 104th House

    Open Access•Mark S Hurwitz, Roger J Moiles et al.•American Political Science Review•2001

  • The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data

    Open Access•Joshua D Clinton, Joshua Clinton et al.•American Political Science Review•2004

Unique citing works11
Citations per year0,61
Citation span2008 - 2026 (19)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 11

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae