Visualizing New Deal Debates
FDR's Big Stick
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6182708 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Victoria Grieve, Victoria M Grieve (Utah State University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 181-215 |
| Publication date | 2015-05-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Congress & the Presidency (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0734-3469 • E-ISSN: 1944-1053 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/07343469.2015.1033567 |
| OpenAlex | W2186254131 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 11 |
This article examines the use of the image of the “big stick” in the context of the New Deal. I argue that the conservative press in the 1930s used the image to mobilize historical memories of over-reaching executive power and a growing federal government under Teddy Roosevelt to “explain” Franklin Roosevelt in 1932. Further, the “big stick” was used to accuse FDR of a drive for dictatorial power during his attempt to reorganize the Supreme Court in 1937. The article argues that the visual image and symbol of the “big stick” shaped contemporary political debates and mobilized the public in the 1930s, and continues to shape American political discourse, as seen in the use of the symbol in the 2012 election
Big business · Big government · Big Idea · Context (archaeology · Government (linguistics · Law and economics · Linguistics · New Deal · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Social science · Sociology · Supreme court · Symbol (formal · American Political and Social Dynamics · History · Law · Philosophy
FDR and the Press
Who Speaks for the President? The White House Press Secretary from Cleveland to Clinton.
The Gender of Reform Politics
Political cartoons as rhetorical form
The Ungentlemanly Art
Supreme Power
Fantasy and rhetorical vision
Running in the Shadows in Campaign 2000
The Cartoon as a Historical Source
Fighting for American Manhood
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |