Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Creating an Angel

Congressional Delegation to Ad Hoc Commissions

Bibliographic Data

ID6182908
AuthorsColton C Campbell (Florida International University, corresponding author)
Year1998
Volume25
Issue2
Pages161-182
Publication date1998-09-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueCongress & the Presidency (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0734-3469 • E-ISSN: 1944-1053
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/07343469809507800
OpenAlexW2042214866
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited24

Congress has historically delegated authority to "angels" to accomplish ends the Congress could not. An increasingly popular form of congressional delegation has been to entrust temporary, independent advisory bodies to render nonpartisan recommendations and advice. Many hypotheses have been advanced to explain what motivates Congress to delegate, and few of these focus on delegation to ad hoc commissions. Most portray delegation as an advantageous way for legislators to favor constituents or shift blame in order to maximize benefits and minimize losses. Others hypothesize that desired outcomes can be achieved only by delegating authority to someone else. This perspective outlines the need to delegate as a principal- agent issue, suggesting that notable benefits, like collective action, are realized through organizations. While each perspective provides some clues as to why Congress will cede authority over policy making to an ad hoc commission, neither fully captures every decision to delegate. However, according to the architects of commissions, not every commission is created with the expectation of doing what members want to avoid or want to do but not openly. The varied reasons suggested in interviews and the resulting commissions may be classified in three basic categories: to take advantage of expertise that is unavailable through standard institutional resources or prohibitively costly to obtain; to shift the blame for unpopular decisions; and, a third factor which does not appear in existing literature, to keep legislators' workloads manageable

Blame · Business · Commission · Computer security · Delegate · Delegated authority · Delegation · Economics · Law and economics · Order (exchange · Perspective (graphical · Political science · Principal (computer security · Public relations · Computer Science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Psychology · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research · Social Psychology

  • Restricting Membership

    Open Access•Jacob R Straus, Wendy R Ginsberg et al.•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2015

  • Creating comity amidst gridlock

    Open Access•Stuart Kasdin•Policy Sciences•2018

  • Policy Crisis and Political Leadership

    Open Access•Daniel J Palazzolo, Vincent G Moscardelli•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2006

  • The Forest Ranger (and the Legislator)

    Open Access•Cory L Struthers, Tyler Andrew Scott et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2022

  • Democratic Policymakers' Ambiguous Support for Reparations

    Open Access•Elizabeth Rigby, Vernicia Griffie•The Journal of Race Ethnicity and…•2025

  • Congressmen's Voting Decisions

    John W Kingdon, John Kingdon•Congressmen's voting decisions•1989

  • Information and Legislative Organization

    Keith Krehbiel•Information and Legislative…•1991

  • Home Style

    Richard F Fenno•Home Style•1978

  • The logic of delegation

    D Roderick Kiewiet•The logic of delegation•1991

  • The evolution of cooperation

    Open Access•Robert Rider•Journal of Economic Behavior &…•1984

  • The Ambiguous Legacy of American Presidential Commissions

    Hugh Davis Graham•The Public Historian•1985

  • The Possibility of Cooperation

    Peter Kollock, Michael Argyle et al.•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1992

  • Congress, The Electoral Connection

    Michael J Ross, David R Mayhew•The Western Political Quarterly•1975

  • Congress

    Open Access•Benjamin I Page•Political Science Quarterly•1975

  • American Business, Public Policy, Case-Studies, and Political Theory

    Open Access•Theodore J Lowi•World Politics•1964

  • Legislative Staffs

    Open Access•Susan Webb Hammond•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1984

  • Closing Military Bases (Finally)

    Open Access•Kenneth H Mayer, Kenneth R Mayer•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1995

  • Who Controls? Information and the Structure of Legislative Decision Making

    Open Access•Arthur Lupia, Mathew D Mccubbins•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1994

  • The Politics of Blame Avoidance

    Open Access•R Kent Weaver•Journal of Public Policy•1986

  • Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in Multidimensional Voting Models

    Kenneth A Shepsle•American Journal of Political…•1979

  • The New Economics of Organization

    Terry M Moe•American Journal of Political…•1984

  • Science, technology, and congress

    Open Access•James E Katz•Society•1993

Citations per year0.25
Citation span2006 - 2025 (20)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae