Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Who Needs the Wealthy? The Effects of Size Scaling on Money in Senate Elections

Bibliographic Data

ID6183085
AuthorsAlex Keena (0000-0003-1197-6546, Virginia Commonwealth University, corresponding author)
Year2019
Volume46
Issue2
Pages235-252
Publication date2019-05-04
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueCongress & the Presidency (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0734-3469 • E-ISSN: 1944-1053
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/07343469.2019.1572673
OpenAlexW2944001312
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited41

A large body scholarship demonstrates that the population size of an electoral district affects elections in important ways, yet little is known about the implications of population size for campaigning and fundraising. I posit that the challenges of running a campaign in a populous electorate require candidates to focus their fundraising efforts on the wealthy. I analyze campaign finance records published by the Federal Election Commission during the 2006–2014 Senate elections and find that Senate candidates running in large states receive fewer donations per capita from in-state donors, but they tend to receive larger donations on average and more money from contributions of $1,500 and above. In sum, candidates running in populous states appear to rely upon comparably smaller pools of wealthy constituents writing larger checks to finance their campaigns. In the context of rising campaign costs, these findings suggest that constituency population growth may exacerbate representational inequalities between citizens and contribute to the growing influence of the wealthy in U.S. politics

Campaign finance · Commission · Context (archaeology · Demographic economics · Economics · Geography · Per capita · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Population · Scholarship · Sociology · State (computer science · Demography · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Gender Politics and Representation · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Administration

  • Unpacking electoral competition

    Juan Miguieles, Fabián Belmar et al.•Policy Studies•2026

  • Constituency size and turnout in mixed electoral systems

    Open Access•Alex Keena•Public Choice•2025

  • Out-Of-State Donors and Legislative Surrogacy in the U.S. Senate

    Open Access•Alex Keena•Political Research Quarterly•2024

  • Constituency Size and Evaluations of Government

    Open Access•Daniel Bowen•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2022

  • The Financiers of Congressional Elections

    Lynda W Powell, Clyde Wilcox et al.•The financiers of congressional…•2003

  • Home Style

    Richard F Fenno•Home Style•1978

  • Size and Democracy

    Open Access•Michael Goldsmith•Environment and Planning C…•2002

  • Affluence and Influence

    Open Access•Martin Gilens•Affluence and Influence•2012

  • Why is There so Little Money in U.S. Politics

    Open Access•Stephen Ansolabehere, John M De Figueiredo et al.•The Journal of Economic…•2003

  • Small Donors

    Open Access•Michael J Malbin•The Forum•2013

  • Congress, The Electoral Connection

    Michael J Ross, David R Mayhew•The Western Political Quarterly•1975

  • Social Media Campaigning

    Open Access•Zachary J Auter, Jeffrey A Fine•Social Science Quarterly•2018

  • Getting Short‐Changed? The Impact of Outside Money on District Representation

    Open Access•Anne E Baker•Social Science Quarterly•2016

  • A Meta‐Analysis of Campaign Contributions' Impact on Roll Call Voting

    Open Access•Douglas D Roscoe, Shannon Jenkins•Social Science Quarterly•2005

  • Congress

    Open Access•Benjamin I Page•Political Science Quarterly•1975

  • Senators on the Campaign Trail

    Open Access•Sarah A Binder, Sarah Binder•Political Science Quarterly•1997

  • Sizing Up the Senate

    Open Access•Fred R Harris•Political Science Quarterly•2000

  • Constituency Population and Representation in the U.S. House

    Open Access•Brian Frederick•American Politics Research•2008

  • Quality, Not Quantity

    D Lublin, David Ian Lublin•The Journal of Politics•1994

  • Mass Media in U. S. Congressional Elections

    Open Access•Edie N Goldenberg, Michael W Traugott•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1987

  • Earmarks and Elections to the U.S. House of Representatives

    Jeffrey Lazarus, Jeffrey M Glas et al.•Congress & the Presidency•2012

  • State Population and the Electoral Success of U.S. Senators

    John R Hibbing, Sara L Brande et al.•American Journal of Political…•1983

  • Local Advantage in Campaign Financing

    Gregory S Thielemann•The Journal of Politics•1993

  • Professionalization and Public Opinion of State Legislatures

    Peverill Squire•The Journal of Politics•1993

  • The Political Geography of Campaign Contributions in American Politics

    James G Gimpel, Frances E Lee et al.•The Journal of Politics•2006

  • Campaign Finance Laws, Policy Outcomes, and Political Equality in the American States

    Open Access•P Flavin•Political Research Quarterly•2015

  • Campaign Politics and the Digital Divide

    Open Access•Paul S Herrnson, Atiya Kai Stokes-Brown et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2007

  • Partisan Politics, Financial Deregulation, and the New Gilded Age

    Open Access•Eric Keller, Eric Reed Keller et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2015

  • Testing Theories of American Politics

    Open Access•Martin Gilens, Benjamin I Page•Perspectives on Politics•2014

  • Prospecting for (Campaign) Gold

    Open Access•Wendy K Tam Cho, James G Gimpel•American Journal of Political…•2007

  • Campaign Contributions Facilitate Access to Congressional Officials

    Open Access•Joshua L Kalla, David E Broockman•American Journal of Political…•2016

  • The Representational Experience

    Bruce I Oppenheimer•American Journal of Political…•1996

  • The Check Is in the Mail

    Open Access•James G Gimpel, Frances E Lee et al.•American Journal of Political…•2008

  • District Voter Turnout and Dyadic Representation in Congress

    P Flavin, Julie Nelson et al.•Congress & the Presidency•2017

  • Don’t Blame Donors for Ideological Polarization of Political Parties

    Open Access•Raymond J La Raja, David L Wiltse•American Politics Research•2012

  • Lobbying as Legislative Subsidy

    Open Access•Richard L Hall, Richard Hall et al.•American Political Science Review•2006

  • Demography and Democracy

    Open Access•John Gerring, Maxwell Palmer et al.•American Political Science Review•2015

  • The Myth of the Vanishing Voter

    Open Access•Michael P Mcdonald, Samuel L Popkin•American Political Science Review•2001

  • City Size and Civic Involvement in Metropolitan America

    Open Access•J Eric Oliver, James E Oliver•American Political Science Review•2000

  • The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout

    Open Access•Alan S Gerber, Donald P Green•American Political Science Review•2000

  • Seats and votes

    Open Access•Rein Taagepera•Social Science Research•1973

Unique citing works4
Citations per year1
Citation span2022 - 2026 (5)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae