Travail forcé et enfermement pénal. Quelques questions sur la naissance de la prison aux États-Unis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6185069 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Danielle Laberge (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1985 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 215-231 |
| Publication date | 1985-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Déviance et Société (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0378-7931 • E-ISSN: 2296-4096 |
| Publisher | PERSEE Program (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3406/ds.1985.1445 |
| OpenAlex | W1981885335 |
| Language | FR |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 1 |
The penal use of prison is often considered as the breaking point in historigraphy. One cannot deny the fundamental transformations implied by the prison and consequently the penitentiary. But their use does not signify a total break with previous repressive policies. The study of the American situation shows that servitude and hard labour may be presented as the bridge between two different repressive logics. Thus servitude was first substituted to capital punishment ; incarceration then appeared as the material modality necessary to the execution of the sanction
Art · Capital punishment · Criminology · Humanities · Political science · Prison · Sociology · Education, sociology, and vocational training · Historical and Scientific Studies · Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,05 |
| Citation span | 1988 - 1992 (5) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |