A Shared Passion for Nonsense
Laura E. Richards and Margaret Atwood
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6187709 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michaela Keck (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Publication date | 2024-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | European Journal of American Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1991-9336 • E-ISSN: 1991-9336 |
| Publisher | OpenEdition (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.4000/12war |
| OpenAlex | W4405290095 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 9 |
This article opens up a transnational and transhistorical dialogue between the two North American women authors Laura E. Richards and Margaret Atwood regarding their shared passion for literary nonsense. I argue that reading Richards’s and Atwood’s nonsense alongside each other highlights the continuity of nonsense’s characteristic duality of subversion and dominance as well as the ongoing social and sexual violence that surrounds their young female protagonists, whose (sexual) agency challenges constructions of “childhood innocence.” Yet where Richards purportedly relates her children’s poetry to the domestic sphere as the proper site to express nonsense and wields it as a creative educational practice, Atwood’s fiction self-reflectively insists that nonsense constitutes a powerful political instrument and weapon in and beyond the nursery
Agency (philosophy · Art · Innocence · Literature · Nonsense · Passion · Poetry · Political science · Politics · Psychoanalysis · Social science · Sociology · Subversion · Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology · Themes in Literature Analysis · Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction
| Highly cited | No |
|---|