Defund or #Re-Fund? Re-examining Bayley’s blueprint for police reform

Datos Bibliográficos

ID6192548
AutoresJacek Koziarski (0000-0002-1954-3991, Department of Sociology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada, autor de correspondencia), Laura Huey (0000-0003-2508-9542, Department of Sociology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada)
Año2021
Volumen45
Número3
Páginas269-284
Fecha de publicación2021-07-03
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaInternational Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0192-4036 • E-ISSN: 2157-6475
EditorialInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/01924036.2021.1907604
OpenAlexW3150381892
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas15
Referencias citadas52

In light of the defund the police movement, it is imperative we consider what police reform could and potentially should look like. Some, for example, have called for a reduced police footprint in marginalised communities through reallocating police funding towards preventative services for a myriad of social issues. However, drawing on David Bayley’s Police for the Future, we show that a dilemma arises with respect to police involvement in these issues: the police cannot be solely relied upon to address all social issues, but they cannot be fully absolved of the responsibility either. As such, further drawing on Bayley’s thoughts for police reform, we instead argue for the adoption of evidence-based policing as a more fruitful driver of meaningful, long-term police reform as it not only enables the police to identify practices that are effective or even harmful, but it also can be used as means for police accountability

Accountability · Blueprint · Criminal justice · Criminology · Dilemma · Police science · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Crime Patterns and Interventions · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Engineering · Law · Policing Practices and Perceptions · Public Administration