Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Constitutive aporia of literature

The case of Kitamura Tōkoku’s theory of literature

Bibliographic Data

ID6194549
AuthorsMiyabi Goto (corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume33
Issue4
Pages731-755
Publication date2021-10-02
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJapan Forum (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0955-5803 • E-ISSN: 1469-932X
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09555803.2019.1676290
OpenAlexW2983504631
LanguageEN
References cited5

Immediately before the Sino-Japanese War broke out in 1894, one heated debate took place among Japanese intellectuals regarding the question: is writing literature a purposive activity? Confronting Yamaji Aizan (1865–1917), Kitamura Tōkoku (1868–1894) underlined literature’s non-purposive quality. Because of Tōkoku’s strong emphasis on literature’s transcendence, scholarship from the later period oftentimes read Tōkoku’s theory against a backdrop of his biography, idolizing this writer as an ultimate advocator of literature’s autonomy. Even in more recent scholarship, the biographical reading of Tōkoku’s work appears prevailing, reinforcing the primacy of biographical historicization. This article challenges such a scholarly predilection and offers fresh understanding of Tōkoku’s theory of literature as the dialectics of historicity and ahistoricity. What Tōkoku posits as pure literature ultimately poses an aporia; it exists only as an impossibility, whose realizability and sustainability are pre-empted at its gestational moment. Taking pure literature’s aporia as a point of departure, this article delves into the implication of the historical claim of literature’s ahistoricity. Tōkoku’s logic operates in a self-cancelling manner, not to overcome, but to dislocate that aporia. Closely examining Tōkoku’s rhetorical move, this article demonstrates that coinciding formation and dislocation of the aporia is in fact constitutive of the pure literature envisioned in Tōkoku’s theory. Precisely because of this aporia, pure literature can serve not as a divider between, but as a relaying point of, historicity and ahistoricity

Humanities · Political science · Politics · Scholarship · Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity · Japanese History and Culture · Narrative Theory and Analysis · Philosophy

  • Yamaji Aizan and His Time

    Yushi Ito•Yamaji Aizan and his time•2007

  • How to Write a Second Restoration

    C Larry Hill, Christopher Hill•Journal of Japanese Studies•2007

  • The Japanese Novel of the Meiji Period and the Ideal of Individualism

    James R Morita, Janet A Walker et al.•Monumenta Nipponica•1980

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae