Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Genocide, Holodomor and Holocaust Discourse as Echo of Historical Injury and as Rhetorical Radicalization in the Russian-Ukrainian Conflict of 2013–18

Bibliographic Data

ID6196607
AuthorsNicolas Dreyer (0000-0003-3620-4155, University of Bamberg, corresponding author)
Year2018
Volume20
Issue4
Pages545-564
Publication date2018-10-02
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Genocide Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1462-3528 • E-ISSN: 1469-9494
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/14623528.2018.1528740
OpenAlexW2900744093
LanguageEN
Citations received9

The Ukrainian crisis has caused an ongoing political confrontation between Russia and Ukraine since 2013. It has been marked by a rhetoric drawing on differently interpreted memories of World War II, the Holodomor and the Holocaust. The rhetoric of “genocide” has become a common denominator in the confrontation over the Ukrainian East and the Crimea. Following Russia's aggression vis-à-vis Ukraine since 2014, Russian and pro-Russian Ukranian voices from politics and the media have accused Ukraine of genocide, which aimed to demonize the perceived enemy, mobilize internal support and gain interpretative authority over events. Ukraine has responded by intensifying its historical discourse of genocide, framing Putin's policies as a direct successor to Stalin's policies of destroying Ukraine. The present article analyses the nature of the rhetoric of the Holodomor, the Holocaust, and of genocide more generally, in the present Ukrainian conflict. It also examines the relationship of this rhetoric with the respective discourses of memory in Ukraine and to lesser extent in Russia. The discussion demonstrates how emphatically the traumas of the past reverberate in this post-Soviet conflict, and suggests that such historical resonance may have to do with the proclivity of both Russia and Ukraine to avoid their historical responsibilities

Genocide · Literature · Political science · Politics · Radicalization · Rhetoric · Rhetorical question · Sociology · The Holocaust · Ukrainian · European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies · History · Law · Nuclear Issues and Defense · Philosophy · Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics

  • The Enemy Next Door

    Open Access•Aram Terzyan•Open Political Science•2021

  • Part of the Civilized World Community’

    Alexandr Voronovici•Ethnopolitics•2022

  • Image substitutes and visual fake history

    Open Access•E Zhukova•Visual Communication•2019

  • Historical memory and securitisation of the Russian intervention in Syria

    Open Access•Mykola Makhortykh•International Politics•2020

  • The politicisation of historical memory on Twitter

    Adrian Trzoss, Wiktor Werner et al.•Rethinking History•2023

  • How Cultural Traumas Occur on Social Media

    Open Access•E Zhukova•International Journal of Politics…•2020

  • Toward the transnational memory of Holodomor

    Open Access•Karolina Koziura•Memory Studies•2024

  • Visual Securitization

    Open Access•Viktorija Rimaitė, Viktorija Rimaitė-Beržiūnienė•Politologija•2022

  • Politics of Memory and Nationalism

    Open Access•Olga Malinova•Nationalities Papers•2021

Citations per year1.29
Citation span2019 - 2024 (6)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae