Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Correcting the past

Failures to replicate psi

Bibliographic Data

ID6201469
AuthorsJeff Galak (0000-0003-1166-8842, University of Florida, corresponding author), Robyn A Leboeuf (0009-0006-2563-6824, University of Florida), L D Nelson (0000-0003-1148-4461, University of Florida), Joseph P Simmons (0000-0002-8833-224X, University of Florida)
Year2012
Volume103
Issue6
Pages933-948
Publication date2012-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Personality and Social Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-3514 • E-ISSN: 1939-1315
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1037/a0029709
PMID22924750
OpenAlexW3124881446
LanguageEN
Citations received23
References cited6

Across 7 experiments (N = 3,289), we replicate the procedure of Experiments 8 and 9 from Bem (2011), which had originally demonstrated retroactive facilitation of recall. We failed to replicate that finding. We further conduct a meta-analysis of all replication attempts of these experiments and find that the average effect size (d = 0.04) is no different from 0. We discuss some reasons for differences between the results in this article and those presented in Bem (2011)

Cognitive psychology · Facilitation · Recall · Replicate · Replication (statistics) · Statistics · Functional Brain Connectivity Studies · Memory Processes and Influences · Neuroscience · Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Psychological science’s replicability crisis and what it means for science in the courtroom

    Jason Chin, Jason M Chin•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2014

  • Perceived crisis and reforms

    Paul De Boeck, Moongee Jeon et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2018

  • Falsifiability is not optional

    Etienne P Lebel, Derek Berger et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2017

  • Best research practices in psychology

    E J Finkel, Paul W Eastwick et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2015

  • Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling

    Open Access•Leslie K John, G Loewenstein et al.•Psychological Science•2012

  • An Agenda for Purely Confirmatory Research

    Open Access•Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Ruud Wetzels et al.•Perspectives on Psychological…•2012

  • Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychology

    Open Access•Jens B Asendorpf, Mycah Conner et al.•European Journal of Personality•2013

  • Psychology's Renaissance

    L D Nelson, Joseph P Simmons et al.•Annual Review of Psychology•2018

  • A Large Scale Test of the Effect of Social Class on Prosocial Behavior

    Open Access•Martin Korndörfer, Boris Egloff et al.•PLoS ONE•2015

  • Effect size reporting and interpretation in social personality research

    Open Access•Linda Farmus, Nataly Beribisky et al.•Current Psychology•2023

  • Psychological science from 'publish or perish' to 'trust but verify'

    Open Access•Anđela Keljanović•Zbornik radova Filozofskog…•2021

  • People’s dispositional cooperative tendencies towards robots are unaffected by robots’ negative emotional displays in prisoner’s dilemma games

    Open Access•Te-Yi Hsieh, Emily S Cro•Cognition & Emotion•2022

  • Co-existing with Drones

    Open Access•Robin Bretin, Emily S Cro et al.•International Journal of Social…•2024

  • Human–Robot Cooperation in Economic Games

    Open Access•Te-Yi Hsieh, Bishakha Chaudhury et al.•International Journal of Social…•2023

  • Preliminary Evidence for an Association between Journal Submission Requirements and Reproducibility of Published Findings

    Open Access•Mitch Brown, Robert E Mcgrath et al.•Journal of Empirical Research on…•2022

  • Psychological Spacetime

    Open Access•Lucian Gideon Conway, Meredith A Repke et al.•SAGE Open•2016

  • Heinous Crime or Unfortunate Incident

    Open Access•Jun Zhao, Christabel L Rogalin•Social Psychology Quarterly•2017

  • Pursuitworthiness in urgent research

    Open Access•Milutin Stojanovic•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2023

  • Novelty versus Replicability

    Open Access•Fernando Romero, Felipe Romero•Philosophy of Science•2017

  • Does the conclusion follow from the evidence? Recommendations for improving research

    Open Access•Andrew H Hales•Journal of Experimental Social…•2016

  • (When) should psychology be a science

    Open Access•Dario Krpan•Journal for the Theory of Social…•2021

  • Thinking Beyond the Bargaining Table

    Open Access•Kai Zhang, Hong Zhang et al.•European Journal of Social…•2025

  • Superstition predicts perception of illusory control

    Open Access•Owen Griffiths, Noor Shehabi et al.•British Journal of Psychology•2019

  • Affective Discrimination of Stimuli That Cannot Be Recognized

    Open Access•William Raft Kunst-Wilson, Robert B Zajonc•Science•1980

  • Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis

    Open Access•Jeffrey N Rouder, Paul L Speckman et al.•Psychonomic Bulletin & Review•2009

  • False-Positive Psychology

    Open Access•Joseph P Simmons, L D Nelson et al.•Psychological Science•2011

  • The Logic of Scientific Discovery

    Karl R Popper, Karl Popper et al.•Physics Today•1959

  • Feeling the future

    Daryl J Bem•Journal of Personality and Social…•2011

  • Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data

    Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Ruud Wetzels et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2011

Unique citing works23
Citations per year1,64
Citation span2012 - 2025 (14)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 19

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae