Proactive control of implicit bias
A theoretical model and implications for behavior change
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 6202290 |
|---|---|
| Autores | David M Amodio (0000-0001-7746-0150, New York University), Jillian K Swencionis (0000-0001-5372-9186, John Jay College of Criminal Justice) |
| Ano | 2018 |
| Volume | 115 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 255-275 |
| Data de publicação | 2018-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0022-3514 • E-ISSN: 1939-1315 |
| Editora | American Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1037/pspi0000128 |
| PMID | 30024242 |
| OpenAlex | W2884797391 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 15 |
| Referências citadas | 58 |
Four experiments examined the effect of proactive control on expressions of implicit racial bias. Whereas reactive control is engaged in response to a biasing influence (e.g., a stereotype, temptation, or distraction), proactive control is engaged in advance of such biases, functioning to strengthen task focus and, by consequence, limiting the affordance for a bias to be expressed in behavior. Using manipulations of response interference to modulate proactive control, proactive control was found to eliminate expressions of weapons bias, prejudice, and stereotyping on commonly used implicit assessments. Process dissociation analysis indicated that this pattern reflected changes in controlled processing but not automatic associations, as theorized, and assessments of neural activity, using event-related potentials, revealed that proactive control reduces early attention to task-irrelevant racial cues while increasing focus on task-relevant responses. Together, these results provide initial evidence for proactive control in social cognition and demonstrate its effectiveness at reducing expressions of implicit racial bias. Based on these findings and past research, we present a model of proactive and reactive control that offers a novel and generative perspective on self-regulation and prejudice reduction. (PsycINFO Database Record
Automaticity · Cognition · Cognitive bias · Cognitive psychology · Control (management) · Distraction · Operationalization · Perception · Prejudice (legal term) · PsycINFO · Response bias · Social cognition · Task (project management) · Temptation · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Cultural Differences and Values · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology
Learning what to inhibit
Click, click, ad
Unobservable stereotypes are more malleable than observable stereotypes in implicit person perception
Revisiting the Policy Implications of Implicit Social Cognition
Preferring patient–physician concordance
A Brief Online Implicit Bias Intervention for School Mental Health Clinicians
Scarcity disrupts the neural encoding of Black faces
Share the wealth
Bilingualism is related to reduced social biases
Influence of cognitive control based on different conflict levels on the expression of gender stereotypes
Cognitive and cultural attitudes to sex educational content on social media in Bangladesh
Relationship between bilingual experiences and social biases
Addressing the inappropriate use of force by police in the United States and beyond
Group value learned through interactions with members
Theorizing Moral Cognition
Mechanisms for the Regulation of Intergroup Responses
DMDX
Working-memory capacity and the control of attention
The variable nature of cognitive control
Conflict monitoring and cognitive control.
Suppression as a Stereotype Control Strategy
A Dynamic Model of Guilt
Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task
Color Blindness and Interracial Interaction
Racial Prejudice and Stereotype Activation
The neuroscience of prejudice and stereotyping
Flexible neural mechanisms of cognitive control within human prefrontal cortex
Multiple Processes by which Attitudes Guide Behavior
A process dissociation framework
G*Power 3
Implicit Measures in Social Cognition Research
Perception and Prejudice
Prejudice Concerns and Race-Based Attentional Bias
Reducing Automatically Activated Racial Prejudice Through Implicit Evaluative Conditioning
Are Racial Stereotypes Really Fading? The Princeton Trilogy Revisited
When Prejudice Does Not Pay
Aversive Racism and Selection Decisions
Intergroup anxiety effects on implicit racial evaluation and stereotyping
Racial Bias in Policing
Separating Multiple Processes in Implicit Social Cognition
Stereotyping and evaluation in implicit race bias
Intergroup anxiety effects on the control of racial stereotypes
Event-related potentials and the decision to shoot
Egalitarian goals trigger stereotype inhibition
Long-term reduction in implicit race bias
Psychophysiological evidence of response conflict and strategic control of responses in affective priming
Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test
Self-regulation of prejudiced responses
Method-Specific Variance in the Implicit Association Test
Individual differences in the activation and control of affective race bias as assessed by startle eyeblink response and self-report
The trouble of thinking
To be liked versus respected
Preconscious control of stereotype activation through chronic egalitarian goals
Conceptualizing Control in Social Cognition
Stereotype activation and control of race bias
The motivation to express prejudice
The regulation of explicit and implicit race bias
Perspective taking combats automatic expressions of racial bias
The police officer's dilemma
Individual differences in the regulation of intergroup bias
Race and gender on the brain
Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice
The psychological science of racial bias and policing
Stereotypes and prejudice
| Obras citantes distintas | 15 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 2,14 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2019 - 2026 (8) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 14 |