Self-enhancement, self-assessment, and self-evaluative task choice
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6202371 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michael J Strube, Michael Strube (0000-0002-4731-8142, Washington University in St. Louis, corresponding author), Laurie A Roemmele |
| Year | 1985 |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 981-993 |
| Publication date | 1985-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-3514 • E-ISSN: 1939-1315 |
| Publisher | American Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1037//0022-3514.49.4.981 |
| PMID | 4057053 |
| OpenAlex | W1963518600 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 34 |
| References cited | 7 |
Past research on self-evaluation indicates that there are two contrasting viewpoints concerning the acquisition of self-knowledge. According to the self-assessment view, accurate information is sought, regardless of its implications for self-esteem. According to the self-enhancement view, accurate information is desirable, but only if it also has positive implications for the self. We examined the conditions under which each view provides an adequate description of self-evaluative task choice. We predicted that both individuals with high self-esteem and individuals with low self-esteem but no tendency to use self-protective strategies would choose maximally informative tasks. By contrast, individuals with low self-esteem and a tendency to use self-protective strategies were expected to choose tasks that were maximally self-enhancing. Subjects chose among four forms of a cognitive abilities test that varied in diagnosticity of success and diagnosticity of failure. As expected, subjects with ego-protective tendencies and low self-esteem preferred the test form that was high in diagnosticity of success but low in diagnosticity of failure, whereas subjects with low self-protective tendencies (both high and low self-esteem) preferred the test form high in diagnosticity of both success and failure. Subjects with both high self-esteem and high self-protective tendencies did not exhibit a clear preference between test forms allowing maximal self-assessment and those allowing self-enhancement. The results suggest the importance of considering both diagnosticity and self-esteem protection in the study of self-evaluation.
Cognitive psychology · Preference · Self · Self evaluation · Self-assessment · Self-concept · Self-control · Self-disclosure · Self-enhancement · Self-esteem · Task (project management · Test (biology · Viewpoints · Applied Psychology · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development · Cultural Differences and Values · Psychology · Resilience and Mental Health · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology · Youth Development and Social Support
Does distrust motivate or discourage employees? The double-edged sword of feeling ability-distrusted by supervisors
Narcissism and self-handicapping
Claimed self-handicaps and the self-handicapper
Control theory interpretation of psychological mechanisms of depression
Motivational factors in decision theories
Self-forgiveness in Psychology and Psychotherapy
Gender Differences in Self-Handicapping
Color and psychological functioning
The Multiply Motivated Self
Metaverse beyond the hype
Adolescent Self-Handicapping, Depressive Affect, and Maternal Parenting Styles
Self-Focus, Gender, and Habitual Self-Handicapping
An attributional account of power in multi-party negotiations
Self-Evaluation
Self-handicapping
Abstract and concrete self-evaluative goals
Assessment, enhancement, and verification determinants of the self-evaluation process
Self-evaluation of abilities
Conceptions of Ability, Achievement Goals, and Individual Differences in Self‐Handicapping Behavior
She works hard for the money
Self-reported versus behavioral self-handicapping
Self-handicapping and intrinsic motivation
The psychology of interpersonal relations.
Difficulty and diagnosticity as determinants of choice among tasks
Effects of difficulty and diagnosticity on choice among tasks in relation to achievement motivation and perceived ability
Self-assessment, self-enhancement, and task preference
A Theory of Social Comparison Processes
On the self-serving function of an academic wooden leg
The self-serving function of hypochondriacal complaints
| Unique citing works | 22 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,85 |
| Citation span | 1986 - 2022 (37) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 28 |