Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Self-essentialist reasoning underlies the similarity-attraction effect

Bibliographic Data

ID6203024
AuthorsCharles Chu (0000-0002-4964-9199, Boston University), Brian S Lowery (0000-0002-3606-7990, Stanford University)
Year2023
Volume125
Issue5
Pages1055-1071
Publication date2023-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Personality and Social Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-3514 • E-ISSN: 1939-1315
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1037/pspi0000425
PMID37053416
OpenAlexW4365450866
LanguageEN
Citations received6

We propose that self-essentialist reasoning is a foundational mechanism of the similarity-attraction effect. Our argument is that similarity breeds attraction in two steps: (a) people categorize someone with a shared attribute as a person like me based on the self-essentialist belief that one's attributes are caused by an underlying essence and (b) then apply their essence (and the other attributes it causes) to the similar individual to infer agreement about the world in general (i.e., a generalized shared reality). We tested this model in four experimental studies (N = 2,290) using both individual difference and moderation-of-process approaches. We found that individual differences in self-essentialist beliefs amplified the effect of similarity on perceived generalized shared reality and attraction across both meaningful (Study 1) and minimal (Study 2) dimensions of similarity. We next found that manipulating (i.e., interrupting) the two crucial steps of the self-essentialist reasoning process-that is, by severing the connection between a similar attribute and one's essence (Study 3) and deterring people from applying their essence to form an impression of a similar other (Study 4)-attenuated the effect of similarity on attraction. We discuss the implications for research on the self, similarity-attraction, and intergroup phenomena. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)

Argument (complex analysis) · Attraction · Categorization · Epistemology · Essentialism · Interpersonal attraction · Moderation · PsycINFO · Similarity (geometry) · Artificial Intelligence · Chemistry · Computer Science · Cultural Differences and Values · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Lay Attributions of Conspiracy Beliefs Predict Intentions to Correct Conspiracy Believers

    Open Access•Valentin Mang, Kai Epstude et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•2026

  • The impact of childhood sexual abuse on adolescent peer relationships

    Open Access•Yao Zhang, Chunyan Zhou et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2025

  • Great minds think alike

    Open Access•Tai-Kuang Peng, Jianan Zhong et al.•Asian Journal Of Social Psychology•2025

  • Same but different

    Open Access•Dolores Morera-Bello, Maryurena Lorenzo et al.•International Journal of…•2026

  • The effect of frameswitching on perceptions of decisiveness, creativity, and job fit

    Open Access•Sabrina Piccolo, Analia F Albuja et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2026

  • How do older adults react to social robots' offspring-like voices

    Open Access•Cheng Zhou, Wanqing Dong et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2025

Unique citing works6
Citations per year6
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae