Covenantal Realism

In this article I contend that conventional social contract theory is self-referentially incoherent. Conventional contractarianism therefore fails to provide an adequate foundation for the authority of the state and for the obligation of citizens to obey. The insistence on consent for legitimate political authority has usually been rendered in contractarian terms. Thus, the fall of conventional social contract theory seemingly entails that we should reject the principle of consent as well. Yet, the necessity of consent for the authority of the state and, concomitantly, for the obligation of citizens to obey seems to be an entailment of human equality. Thus, insofar as human persons are equal, the legitimacy of the state seems to require a foundation logically precluded to it. We are therefore confronted with a theoretical crisis. Even so, I will argue that we need not reject the principle of consent. The self-referential incoherency of conventional contractarianism results from its conventionalism. We can begin the work of salvaging the principle of consent from the demise of conventional social contract theory by erecting it upon the foundation of moral and ontological realism

Conventionalism · Epistemology · Law and economics · Legitimacy · Obligation · Political science · Politics · Social contract · Sociology · Free Will and Agency · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics · War, Ethics, and Justification

• Increased destination patronage

  Alexander Kofi Preko, Theophilus Gyepi-Garbrah et al.•Current Issues in Tourism•2026

  Add to list

• Leviathan Leashed

  Paul R Dehart•Critical Review•2013

  Add to list