Collective Learning through Climate Knowledge Systems
The Case of South Africa
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6213499 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Babette Never (0000-0002-7108-2256, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 231-256 |
| Publication date | 2012-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Politikon (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0258-9346 • E-ISSN: 1470-1014 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/02589346.2012.683941 |
| OpenAlex | W2088620388 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 37 |
Climate knowledge systems capture how collective learning takes place in climate governance. The pragmatic-constructivist concept advances Emanuel Adler's cognitive evolution approach. It shows how different types of knowledge, communities of practice, power and feedback-loops connect systematically and influence processes of change in domestic climate governance. This paper develops the concept and tests two hypotheses in an exploratory way for the case of South Africa, (1) on the existence and impact of the knowledge system and (2) on the relevance of the knowledge type ‘pragmatic knowledge’ for advancing climate governance. The study has a mixed-methods design, drawing on data from an expert survey and a series of semi-structured interviews. The results confirm the existence of a knowledge system in South Africa that revolves around a small number of communities of practice. It has begun to provide a dynamic order and advances learning and change, but as yet communities of practice lack power to widely institutionalize new knowledge and practices. Acknowledgements The author thanks Klaus Jacob, Miranda Schreurs, Robert Kappel, Miriam Prys, Malte Gephart and Meenakshi Preisser for their helpful comments and suggestions. Funding for the research in South Africa was provided by the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD). Notes The meaning of the knowledge dimensions scientific, technological, normative and ideological knowledge in the climate change context have been clarified through an email exchange with Emmanuel Adler in Spring 2009. The ten countries are Argentina, Brazil, China, Democratic Republic Congo, India, Indonesia, Iran, Mexico, South Africa, South Korea. Interviews with Government 3, 15/02/2010, Pretoria; Expert 3, 02/03/2010, Cape Town; Expert 5, 20/01/2010, Johannesburg. Interview with Government 3, id. Interviews with eg Business 4, 03/02/2010, Pretoria; Business 6, 03/03/2010, Cape Town; Business 7, 04/03/2010, Cape Town. Interview with Business 3, 05/02/2010, Johannesburg. E.g. Interview with Academic/Expert 5, 15/02/2010, Johannesburg. Interview with Government 1, 27/01/2010, Pretoria. Interviews with Business 4, 03/02/, Pretoria; Government 5, 02/03/2010; observation of print media such as Mail&Guardian and Engineering News over various years. No methodological content analysis of the media was undertaken. Interview with Business 5, 03/03/10, Cape Town. E.g. Interview with Academic/Expert 9, 02/03/2010, Cape Town. Additional informationNotes on contributorsBabette Never GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies and University of Hamburg
Archaeology · Context (archaeology · Corporate governance · Geography · Government (linguistics · Indigenous · Management · Political science · Sociology · Traditional knowledge · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Complex Systems and Decision Making · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Communities of Practice
Global Commons, Domestic Decisions
Changing the Atmosphere
Policy change and learning
Agendas, alternatives, and public policies
Eclectic Theorizing in the Study and Practice of International Relations
Politikwandel und seine Messung in der vergleichenden Staatstätigkeitsforschung
The Oxford Handbook of International Relations
Governance and the Commons in a Multi-Level World
The Fragmentation of Global Governance Architectures
The Role of Science in Environmental Governance
Conceptualizing Climate Governance Beyond the International Regime
Institutions for Scientific Advice
Competing discourses of energy development
A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes
The political economy of global environmental governance
Measuring party orientations towards European integration
Networked Governance or Just Networks? Local Governance of the Knowledge Economy in Limerick (Ireland) and Karlskrona (Sweden)
When does power listen to truth? A constructivist approach to the policy process
International Norm Dynamics and Political Change
Introduction
Dawn of a New Climate Order
Climate Governance Beyond the State
The Spread of Security Communities
Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State
Expert Interpretations of Party Space and Party Locations in 42 Societies
Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science
Shooting the Rapids
Dismantling the Divide Between Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge
Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-level Governance
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,33 |
| Citation span | 2014 - 2025 (12) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |