South Africa’s dwindling developmental local government
A Dying Dream
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6213565 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Marcel Felicity Nagar (0000-0001-9629-2156, National Research Foundation (NRF) South African Research Chairs Initiative (SARChI): African Diplomacy and Foreign Policy, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 366-381 |
| Publication date | 2022-10-02 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Politikon (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0258-9346 • E-ISSN: 1470-1014 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/02589346.2022.2151688 |
| OpenAlex | W4310389544 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 20 |
This article brings politics and Democratic Developmental State (DDS) theory back into the debates surrounding the operationalisation of Developmental Local Government (DLG) in South Africa. It interrogates the extent to domestic political factors and actors have impacted the ability of the DLG to fulfil its constitutional and developmental mandate. It does so by adopting a theoretical case study methodology in assessing the functioning of South Africa’s DLG against three ‘micro-foundations’ of the DDS model: Developmental-Oriented Leadership, Effective Local ‘Pilot Agency’ and Meritocratic Bureaucracy, and Developmental Performance. It finds that the political imperatives and motives of the ANC at play at the onset of democracy in 1994 coupled with the local politicking ever since has crippled the ability of local government to fulfil its constitutional and developmental mandate. This article proposes the adoption of the Developmental Civil Society (DCS) model as a tool to circumvent South African local power politics and boost developmental capacity at the local level in order to fully realise a DDS. It goes beyond the objective of DLG through the self-empowerment of citizens, not only as policy formulators and passive recipients of development, but as active producers of inclusive socioeconomic development
Agency (philosophy · Bureaucracy · Democracy · Developmental state · Economic growth · Economics · Empowerment · Government (linguistics · Local government · Mandate · Meritocracy · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Social science · Sociology · Human Rights and Development · Law · Legal Issues in South Africa · Public Administration · Public-Private Partnership Projects
| Highly cited | No |
|---|