Climatologists’ Communication of Climate Science to the Agricultural Sector
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6219085 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Adam K Wilke (Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA, corresponding author), Lois Wright Morton (Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 371-395 |
| Publication date | 2015-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Science Communication (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1075-5470 • E-ISSN: 1552-8545 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1075547015581927 |
| OpenAlex | W2095993230 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 49 |
Farming is a risky business. Climate science information can assist agriculture in formulating management decisions that hedge against uncertainty and risks. Climatologists are key actors in communicating historical trends and forecast information. Interviews and surveys of climatologists in the North Central Region reveal that they are providing accurate and objective information but are likely to let the science speak for itself. This suggests missed opportunities to communicate climate science in ways that make science relevant to decision maker beliefs, values, and practical applications. Furthermore, more active engagement with agriculture could increase colearning necessary for effective adaptive management under increasingly variable climate conditions
Agriculture · Business · Climate change · Climate science · Environmental resource management · Geography · Hedge · Political science · Public relations · Science communication · Science education · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Climate variability and models · Computer Science · Environmental Science · Species Distribution and Climate Change · Ecology
Role Perceptions in Climate Science Communication
A State of Emergency or Business as Usual in Climate Science Communication? A Three-Dimensional Perspective on the Role Perceptions of Climate Scientists, Climate Journalists, and Citizens
An examination of digital empathy
When AI sees hotter
Enacting Multiple Audiences
The Diffusion of Innovations in Agricultural Circles
Risk Society
Adapting agriculture to climate change
Global and Local Concerns
Climate Change Impacts in the United States
Public Engagement as a Means of Restoring Public Trust in Science – Hitting the Notes, but Missing the Music?
Experience-Based and Description-Based Perceptions of Long-Term Risk
Social Research Methods
The meaning of `public understanding of science' in the United States after World War II
The roles of rhetoric in the public understanding of science
Unrealized Potential
Talking Past Each Other? Cultural Framing of Skeptical and Convinced Logics in the Climate Change Debate
A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales
The relationship between personal experience and belief in the reality of global warming
Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics, and Science
Risk Perception and Communication Unplugged
The Association of Knowledge with Concern About Global Warming
Public Understanding of, and Attitudes toward, Scientific Research
Understanding Farmer Perspectives on Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation
The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks
Public representations of scientific uncertainty about global climate change
Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys
Science and Advocacy Are Different - And We Need to Keep Them That Way
Communicating climate change
What Factors Predict Scientists' Intentions to Participate in Public Engagement of Science Activities
Creating usable science
Climatologists’ patterns of conveying climate science to the agricultural community
Public understanding of climate change in the United States
Communicating Climate Change
Risk society
Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge
Cultural cognition of scientific consensus
What shapes perceptions of climate change
Weighted kappa
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,6 |
| Citation span | 2016 - 2026 (11) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |