Passive Aggressive
Scalia and Garner on Interpretation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6226364 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Andrew Koppelman (0009-0008-3023-6205, Northwestern University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 227-239 |
| Publication date | 2014-05-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | boundary 2 (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0190-3659 • E-ISSN: 1527-2141 |
| Publisher | Duke University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1215/01903659-2686160 |
| OpenAlex | W2010621008 |
| Language | EN |
Antonin Scalia’s coauthored treatise on legal interpretation is also a melodrama, with sharply drawn good guys and bad guys. The hero is the Faithful and Impartial Judge, the servant of Democracy. The argument is weak and inconsistent with Scalia’s actual practice as a judge. The book nonetheless nicely accomplishes what it is trying to do. Scalia is one of the authors, to be sure, but he is also the protagonist of a narrative. The author’s preeminent concern is seeing to it that you perceive the protagonist as the author intends: as the champion of judicial restraint, against all those liberal oligarchs. If you buy the story of Virtuous Scalia, that empowers Judicial Activist Scalia
Argument (complex analysis · Art · Champion · Democracy · HERO · Interpretation (philosophy · Judicial activism · Judicial restraint · Judicial review · Literature · Narrative · Originalism · Political science · Politics · Servant · Sociology · Supreme court · Engineering · Law · Legal principles and applications · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|