Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Presidents Have Problems Too

The Logic of Intra-branch Delegation in East Asian Democracies

Bibliographic Data

ID6227202
AuthorsJeeyang Rhee Baum (University of California San Diego, corresponding author)
Year2007
Volume37
Issue4
Pages659-684
Publication date2007-10-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBritish Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-1234 • E-ISSN: 1469-2112
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0007123407000361
OpenAlexW2116040683
LanguageEN
Citations received12

This article addresses the codification of formal rules and procedures of governance through Administrative Procedure Acts (APAs). The recent enactment of APAs in two new democracies, South Korea and Taiwan, highlights an apparent paradox. Because administrative reform limits the executive's power, it is clear why legislatures in separation-of-power systems would favour APAs. But it is less clear why presidents would support them. Why would a president accept a law designed to restrict her ability to act freely? The answer is that presidents have agency problems too. The more intra-branch conflict they face during their administrations, the more likely they will support administrative reform. Thus, instead of tying the hands of future administrations, presidents also use APAs to overcome current control problems. Three recently democratized East Asian countries, two with APAs (South Korea and Taiwan) and one without (Philippines), support this ‘reining in’ theory. Conflict within the executive branch may be an important ingredient in democratic consolidation. APAs result from political struggle

Agency (philosophy · Consolidation (business · Corporate governance · Delegation · Democracy · Democratic consolidation · Democratization · Divided government · Economics · Executive power · Legislature · Management · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Separation of powers · Sociology · Tying · Accounting · International Arbitration and Investment Law · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Ombudsman and Human Rights · Public Administration

  • Thieves, Opportunists, and Autocrats

    Dinissa Duvanova•Thieves, Opportunists, and…•2023

  • Delegation, Agenda Control, and Budget Reform in Brazil, 1999–2008

    Open Access•Sérgio Praça, Sérgio Rodrigo Marchiori Praca•Latin American Research Review•2015

  • Slowing at Sunset

    Open Access•Jeeyang Rhee Baum, Kathleen Bawn•Journal of East Asian Studies•2011

  • Breaking Authoritarian Bonds

    Open Access•Jeeyang Rhee Baum•Journal of East Asian Studies•2005

  • Legislative Hearings and Presidential Cabinet Management

    Open Access•Don S Lee•Governance•2025

  • Making Rules about Rulemaking

    Open Access•Christian B Jensen, Christian Jensen et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2011

  • Constraining a Shadowy Future

    Open Access•Jeeyang Rhee Baum, Christian B Jensen et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2016

  • Delegation Dilemmas

    Open Access•Marcus André Melo, Carlos Pereira et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2010

  • Reining in the Bureaucrats

    Open Access•Jeeyang Rhee Baum•Governance•2007

  • The impact of bureaucratic openness on public trust in South Korea

    Jeeyang Rhee Baum•Democratization•2009

  • Bureaucratic Discretion and the Regulatory Burden

    Open Access•Dinissa Duvanova•British Journal of Political…•2012

  • The enactment of public participation in rulemaking

    Open Access•Fabrizio De Francesco, J Tosun•Swiss Political Science Review•2023

Citations per year0.57
Citation span2005 - 2025 (21)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae