More on Joining Interest Groups
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6227403 |
|---|---|
| Authors | D Marsh (0000-0002-3308-8585, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1978 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 380-384 |
| Publication date | 1978-07-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | British Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-1234 • E-ISSN: 1469-2112 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0007123400001435 |
| OpenAlex | W2152868426 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 5 |
Shackleton's comment on my earlier article seems to me to raise a number of interesting questions. He is very critical of my methodology and suggests alternative ways of testing Olson's model. He places most emphasis on the need to consider aggregate data on the changing patterns of interest group membership over time. In this short note I do not intend to reply at length to Shackleton's criticisms. Instead, I shall re-examine Olson's analysis using aggregate data on the changing patterns of CBI membership in the last decade
Aggregate (composite · Aggregate data · Econometrics · Economics · Epistemology · Interest group · Mathematical economics · Operations research · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Statistics · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
| Citations per year | 0.11 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1979 - 2022 (44) |
| Highly cited | No |