Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Blasphemy, Offensiveness and Law

Bibliographic Data

ID6228705
AuthorsPeter Jones (0000-0001-5089-4143, corresponding author)
Year1980
Volume10
Issue2
Pages129-148
Publication date1980-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBritish Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-1234 • E-ISSN: 1469-2112
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0007123400002064
OpenAlexW2171412747
LanguageEN
Citations received12
References cited11

Of all the freedoms cherished by liberals, perhaps none is more cherished than freedom of expression. Most would accept that some limits should be placed upon that freedom, but what sort of limits those should be and how far they should extend are matters of controversy. That controversy is all the greater when the purpose for which free expression is limited is itself one which is as potentially compromising to liberalism as the prevention of offence to people's feelings. In this paper I shall examine the relative claims of free expression and offended feelings by focusing on a subject which juxtaposes the two particularly clearly: blasphemy

Blasphemy · Expression (computer science · Feeling · Freedom of expression · Human rights · Liberalism · Political science · Politics · Subject (documents · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Law · Philosophy · Political Theology and Sovereignty · Psychology · Social Psychology · War, Ethics, and Justification

  • Blasphemy As Violence

    Christoph Baumgartner•Journal of Religion in Europe•2013

  • Prosocial religions as folk-technologies of mutual policing

    Léo Fitouchi, Manvir Singh et al.•2023

  • Non diis curae

    S T Drozdov•Etnograficheskoe obozrenie•2023

  • Blasphemy As A Thick Concept

    Open Access•Oscar Pérez De La Fuente•The Age of Human Rights Journal•2020

  • Arguments for the Legal Coercion of Offensive Actions

    Open Access•Mark S Nattrass, Mark Nattrass•Journal of Political Philosophy•1994

  • Democratic legitimacy, political speech and viewpoint neutrality

    Open Access•Kristian Skagen Ekeli•Philosophy & Social Criticism•2021

  • Islam in Europa – Integration durch Recht und ihre Grenzen

    Open Access•C Joppke•KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für…•2013

  • The Cartoon Controversy

    Open Access•Sune Laegaard•Political Studies•2007

  • Respecting Beliefs and Rebuking Rushdie

    Open Access•Peter Jones•British Journal of Political…•1990

  • Blasphemy and Judicial Legitimacy in Indonesia

    Open Access•Adam Tyson•Politics and Religion•2021

  • The instrumental turn of citizenship

    C Joppke•New Community•2019

  • Islam and the legal enforcement of morality

    Open Access•C Joppke•Theory and Society•2014

  • Anarchy, State, and Utopia

    Robert Nozick•Anarchy, State, and Utopia•1975

  • Law, Liberty, and Morality

    H L A Hart•Law, Liberty, and Morality•1963

  • Anarchy, State, and Utopia

    Robert Nozick•Princeton Readings in Political…•2018

  • John Stuart Mill and the Limits of State Action (1973)

    Richard Wollheim, J Wolff•Socialism and Culture (1961)•2025

  • Freedom under the Law

    John Willis, Alfred Thompson Denning Denning et al.•University of Toronto Law Journal•1950

  • The Principles of Politics

    D D Raphael, J R Lucas•The Philosophical Quarterly•1967

Unique citing works12
Citations per year0,33
Citation span1990 - 2023 (34)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 12

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae