Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Measuring Change on the Supreme Court

Examining Alternative Models

Bibliographic Data

ID6229451
AuthorsJeffrey A Segal (corresponding author)
Year1985
Volume29
Issue3
Pages461
Publication date1985-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0092-5853 • E-ISSN: 1540-5907
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2111139
OpenAlexW2040117371
LanguageEN
Citations received24
References cited10

Constitutional interpretation is clearly a dynamic process. Understanding the Warren Court's decisions may not be sufficient in trying to explain the Burger Court's. Previous quantitative attempts to examine how judges or courts have changed, however, have one crucial shortcoming: they fail to control for the nature of the cases being decided. By employing a fact model of search and seizure decision making, Warren and Burger Court cases were analyzed to determine the dynamics of the Burger Court's conservatism. Using probit analysis to test various predisposition and variable change models, it was determined that the model which assumed that each Nixon/Ford appointment added similarly to the Burger Court's conservatism worked best. Furthermore, it was concluded that the change seemed to be in the Court's predisposition to find searches reasonable, rather than in its treatment of particular facts

Conservatism · Econometrics · Economics · Interpretation (philosophy · Majority opinion · Political science · Politics · Probit model · Supreme court · Test (biology · Computer Science · Diverse Academic Research Areas · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Legal and Constitutional Studies · Psychology

  • Government and Individual Liberty

    Open Access•Marc G Pufong, CHARLES KLUBALL•Politics & Policy•2009

  • The Social Movement Turn in Law

    Open Access•Scott L Cummings•Law & Social Inquiry•2017

  • Identifying the Median Justice on the Supreme Court through Multidimensional Scaling

    Open Access•B Grofman, Timothy J Brazill•Public Choice•2002

  • Collegial Influence and Judicial Voting Change

    Open Access•Scott R Meinke, Kevin M Scott•Law & Society Review•2007

  • U.S. Supreme Court Decision-Making and the Free Exercise Clause

    Open Access•Joseph Ignagni, Joseph A Ignagni•The Review of Politics•1993

  • Separating Partisanship from Party in Judicial Research

    Open Access•Randall D Lloyd•American Political Science Review•1995

  • Measuring Policy Change in the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Lawrence Baum•American Political Science Review•1988

  • Integrating Alternative Approaches to the Study of Judicial Voting

    Donald R Songer, Susan B Haire et al.•American Journal of Political…•1992

  • But Do They Have to See It to Know It? The Supreme Court's Obscenity and Pornography Decisions

    Open Access•Timothy M Hagle•The Western Political Quarterly•1991

  • The Supreme Court and Sex Discrimination

    Open Access•Jeffrey A Segal, Cheryl D Reedy•The Western Political Quarterly•1988

  • An Empirical Test of the Rational-Actor Theory of Litigation

    Donald R Songer, Charles M Cameron et al.•The Journal of Politics•1995

  • Public Opinion, the Attitudinal Model, and Supreme Court Decision Making

    William Mishler, Reginald S Sheehan•The Journal of Politics•1996

  • Supreme Court Justices as Human Decision Makers

    Jeffrey A Segal•The Journal of Politics•1986

  • Membership Change and Collective Voting Change in the United States Supreme Court

    Lawrence Baum•The Journal of Politics•1992

  • Measuring Legal Change

    James F Spriggs, Thomas G Hansford•Political Research Quarterly•2000

  • Bias and Judging

    Allison P Harris, Malcolm Sen et al.•Annual Review of Political Science•2019

  • The Hierarchy of Justice

    Donald R Songer, Jeffrey A Segal et al.•American Journal of Political…•1994

  • Judicial Behavior and the Rehnquist Court's Federalism Revolution

    Open Access•Kevin M Scott•American Politics Research•2008

  • The Influence of Law in the Supreme Court’s Search-and-Seizure Jurisprudence

    Open Access•Herbert M Kritzer, Mark J Richards•American Politics Research•2005

  • The Development of a Legal Rule

    Open Access•Paul J Wahlbeck•Law & Society Review•1998

  • Lawyers, Organized Interests, and the Law of Obscenity

    Open Access•Kevin T Mcguire, Gregory A Caldeira•American Political Science Review•1993

  • Comparing the Policy Positions of Supreme Court Justices from Different Periods

    Lawrence Baum•The Western Political Quarterly•1989

  • Contextual Influences on Court Outcomes

    Lettie Mcspadden Wenner, Lee E Dutter•The Western Political Quarterly•1988

  • The Supreme Court as a Countermajoritarian Institution? The Impact of Public Opinion on Supreme Court Decisions

    Open Access•William Mishler, Reginald S Sheehan•American Political Science Review•1993

  • Tests of Equality Between Sets of Coefficients in Two Linear Regressions

    Gregory C Chow•Econometrica•1960

  • Generational Change in American Politics

    Norval D Glenn, Paul R Abramson•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1976

  • Electoral choice in 1972

    John H Aldrich•Journal of Mathematical Sociology•1977

  • A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables

    Richard D Mckelvey, William Zavoina•Journal of Mathematical Sociology•1975

  • Personal Attribute Models of the Voting Behavior of U.S. Supreme Court Justices

    Open Access•C Neal Tate•American Political Science Review•1981

  • The relative effects of maturation, time period, and appointing president on district judges' policy choices

    Open Access•C K Rowland, Robert A Carp•Political Behavior•1983

  • Of Time and Partisan Stability

    Open Access•Philip E Converse•Comparative Political Studies•1969

  • Probing the Bounds of Conventional Wisdom

    John Aldrich, John H Aldrich et al.•American Journal of Political…•1975

  • Predicting Supreme Court Cases Probabilistically

    Open Access•Jeffrey A Segal•American Political Science Review•1984

  • Voting Behavior on the United States Courts of Appeals Revisited

    Open Access•Sheldon Goldman•American Political Science Review•1975

Unique citing works24
Citations per year0,6
Citation span1986 - 2019 (34)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 24

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae