Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Policy Goals in Judicial Gatekeeping

A Proximity Model of Discretionary Jurisdiction

Bibliographic Data

ID6229673
AuthorsLawrence Baum (corresponding author)
Year1977
Volume21
Issue1
Pages13
Publication date1977-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0092-5853 • E-ISSN: 1540-5907
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2110445
OpenAlexW2333856206
LanguageEN
Citations received37

Business · Economics · Gatekeeping · Jurisdiction · Law and economics · Political science · European and International Law Studies · International Arbitration and Investment Law · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems

  • Lower Court Disagreements as Cues for Agenda Setting in the High Court of Australia

    Open Access•Russell Smyth, Patrick Leslie et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2026

  • American indians in court

    Open Access•John R Hermann•The Social Science Journal•2000

  • Strategic Considerations and Judicial Review

    Open Access•Laura Langer•Public Choice•2003

  • Conflict with Supreme Court Precedent and the Granting of Plenary Review

    S Sidney Ulmer•The Journal of Politics•1983

  • Selecting Cases for Supreme Court Review

    Open Access•S Sidney Ulmer•American Political Science Review•1978

  • Municipalities at Court

    Open Access•William M Myers, Davia C Downey•Publius The Journal of Federalism•2025

  • An econometric analysis of the U.S. Supreme Court's certiorari decisions

    Open Access•Jan Palmer•Public Choice•1982

  • A Note On Substantive Access Doctrines in the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•William A Taggart, Matthew R Dezee•The Western Political Quarterly•1985

  • Coping with change

    Open Access•Grace Budrys•Sociology of Health & Illness•1993

  • Explaining Executive Success in the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Kevin T Mcguire•Political Research Quarterly•1998

  • Issue Fluidity on the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Kevin T Mcguire, Barbara Palmer•American Political Science Review•1995

  • Organized Interests and Agenda Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Gregory A Caldeira, John Wright et al.•American Political Science Review•1988

  • Macro Implementation

    Open Access•Matthew E K Hall•American Journal of Political…•2016

  • But Do They Have to See It to Know It? The Supreme Court's Obscenity and Pornography Decisions

    Open Access•Timothy M Hagle•The Western Political Quarterly•1991

  • The Supreme Court and Sex Discrimination

    Open Access•Jeffrey A Segal, Cheryl D Reedy•The Western Political Quarterly•1988

  • The Downstream Effects of Certiorari

    Open Access•Sahar Abi-Hassan, J M Box-Steffensmeier et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2025

  • The Gatekeeping Function

    Stuart Soroka, Stuart N Soroka•The Journal of Politics•2012

  • The Emergence of a New Ideology

    Timothy M Hagle, Harold J Spaeth•The Journal of Politics•1992

  • Strategies in Certiorari Voting on the United States Supreme Court

    Saul Brenner, John F Krol•The Journal of Politics•1989

  • Repeat Players in the Supreme Court

    Kevin T Mcguire•The Journal of Politics•1995

  • Placing State Supreme Courts in State Politics

    Open Access•Paul Brace, Melinda Gann Hall et al.•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2001

  • The Motivational Bases of Political Behavior

    Michael Hooper•Public Opinion Quarterly•1983

  • Getting Attention

    Open Access•C Scott Peters•Political Research Quarterly•2007

  • Issue Fluidity and Agenda Setting on the Warren Court

    Open Access•Barbara Palmer•Political Research Quarterly•1999

  • Designing Tests of the Supreme Court and the Separation of Powers

    Open Access•Brian R Sala, James F Spriggs•Political Research Quarterly•2004

  • From simplicity to complexity

    Open Access•James L Gibson•Political Behavior•1983

  • Law, Policymaking, and the Policy Process

    Open Access•Stephen Barclay, Scott Barclay et al.•Policy Studies Journal•1998

  • Access to the Federal Courts

    Gregory J Rathjen, Harold J Spaeth•American Journal of Political…•1979

  • The United States Supreme Court and Criminal Cases, 1935–1976

    Open Access•Gregory A Caldeira•British Journal of Political…•1981

  • How rational are justices on the Supreme Court of the United States? Doctrinal considerations during agenda setting

    Open Access•Udi Sommer•Rationality and Society•2011

  • Amicus Curiae Briefs by the Solicitor General during the Warren and Burger Courts

    Open Access•Jeffrey A Segal•The Western Political Quarterly•1988

  • The Impact of Supreme Court Activity on the Judicial Agenda

    Open Access•Deborah Rice, Douglas Rice•Law & Society Review•2014

  • The Precedent That Wasn't

    Open Access•Jon B Gould•Law & Society Review•2001

  • The Discuss List

    Open Access•Gregory A Caldeira, John Wright et al.•Law & Society Review•1990

  • Issues, Agendas, and Decision Making on the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Kevin T Mcguire, Barbara Palmer•American Political Science Review•1996

  • Denial of Access and Ideological Preferences

    Gregory J Rathjen, Harold J Spaeth•The Western Political Quarterly•1983

  • Supreme Court Support for the Solicitor General

    Jeffrey A Segal•The Western Political Quarterly•1990

Unique citing works37
Citations per year0,77
Citation span1978 - 2026 (49)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 37

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae