Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Senatorial Delay in Confirming Federal Judges, 1947-1998

Bibliographic Data

ID6231029
AuthorsSarah A Binder, Sarah Binder (0000-0002-9489-6551), Forrest Maltzman
Year2002
Volume46
Issue1
Pages190
Publication date2002-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0092-5853 • E-ISSN: 1540-5907
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/3088422
OpenAlexW2326725377
LanguageEN
Citations received106
References cited16

presidential appointees to the lower federal bench. Here, we focus on the duration of the confirmation process for presidential appointees to the United States Circuit Courts of Appeal between 1947 and 1998 and explain the variation over time in the length of the confirmation process. With newly collected data on the fate of all appellate nominees during that period, we show how ideological incentives and institutional opportunities combine to affect the timing of Senate confirma? tion of judicial appointees

Appeal · Economics · Ideology · Incentive · Political science · Politics · Presidential system · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Legal and Constitutional Studies · Public Administration

  • The Judicial Common Space

    Lee Epstein, A D Martins et al.•The Journal of Law Economics and…•2007

  • Lawmaking

    Open Access•Jamie L Carson, Mark E Owens et al.•Emerging Trends in the Social and…•2015

  • Executives—The American Presidency

    William G Howell•The Oxford Handbook of Political…•2009

  • The New Separation‐of‐Powers Approach to American Politics

    Rui J P De Figueiredo, Tonja Jacobi et al.•The Oxford handbook of political…•2009

  • Public Policy and Political Dysfunction

    Open Access•Suzanne Mettler, Claire Leavitt•Can America Govern Itself?•2019

  • Sentencing in the Shadow of Promotion

    Open Access•Nicholas Goldrosen•Journal of Empirical Legal Studies•2026

  • A House Divided? Roll Calls, Polarization, and Policy Differences in the U.S. House, 1877–2011

    Open Access•David A Bateman, Joshua D Clinton et al.•American Journal of Political…•2017

  • Is Divided Government a Cause of Legislative Delay

    Patricia A Kirkland, Jane H Phillips•Quarterly Journal of Political…•2018

  • Quién legisla en México? Descentralización y proceso legislativo

    Open Access•Luisa Béjar Algazi•Revista Mexicana de Sociología•2012

  • May It Appease the Court

    Hayley Munir, Syed Rashid Munir•The Journal of Asian Studies•2025

  • O senado e as aprovações de autoridades

    Open Access•Leany Barreiro Lemos, Leany Barreiro De S Lemos et al.•Revista Brasileira de Ciências…•2007

  • Hidden in Plain Sight

    Open Access•Morrgan T Herlihy•Journal of Law and Courts•2026

  • Party Defection in Senate Confirmations of Executive Nominees

    Ryan Bookstein, Kristina C Miler•Congress & the Presidency•2026

  • Lower Federal Court Judicial Confirmation Fights

    Open Access•Salmon A Shomade, Roger E Hartley et al.•PS Political Science & Politics•2014

  • In the Mold of Justice Scalia”

    Open Access•Amanda Hollis‐brusky, Celia Parry•The Forum•2021

  • Nuclear Fallout

    Open Access•Jeffrey A Fine, Margaret S Williams•The Forum•2016

  • Nuclear Fallout

    Open Access•Christina L Boyd, Michael S Lynch et al.•The Forum•2015

  • Gendered Polarization and Abortion Policymaking in the States

    Open Access•Abigail A Matthews, Rebecca J Kreitzer et al.•The Forum•2020

  • Binders Full of Judges

    Open Access•Alicia Uribe‐mcguire•Journal of Law and Courts•2022

  • How Judicial Qualification Ratings May Disadvantage Minority and Female Candidates

    Open Access•Malcolm Sen•Journal of Law and Courts•2014

  • The Influence of Federalist Society Affiliation on Senator Voting in Federal Judicial Nominations

    Open Access•Christine C Bird, Jonathan M King et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2025

  • Quality in Measurement Matters

    Open Access•James A Sieja•Journal of Law and Courts•2024

  • The Political Determinants of Public Support for Obstruction of Supreme Court Nominees

    Open Access•Andrew Stones•Journal of Law and Courts•2024

  • Packing the Courts

    Open Access•Elli Menounou, Adam Feldman et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2018

  • Going Nuclear

    Open Access•Corey Bopp•Open Journal of Political Science•2019

  • Mainstream media’s coverage of the Gezi protests and protesters’ perception of mainstream media

    Open Access•Mustafa Oz•Global Media and Communication•2016

  • Senate Gate-Keeping, Presidential Staffing of “Inferior Offices,” and the Ideological Composition of Appointments to the Public Bureaucracy

    Adam Bonica, Jowei Chen et al.•Quarterly Journal of Political…•2015

  • A Regression Discontinuity Design for Studying Divided Government

    Open Access•Patricia A Kirkland, Jane H Phillips•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2020

  • The Curious Case of the Migrating Seat

    Open Access•Joshua Boston, Patrick Rickert et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2025

  • Advising, Consenting, Delaying, and Expediting

    Open Access•J M Box-Steffensmeier, Charles P Campisano et al.•Studies in American Political…•2016

  • Pivotal Politics, Presidential Capital, and Supreme Court Nominations

    Timothy R Johnson, Jason M Roberts•Congress & the Presidency•2005

  • Choosing When to Choose

    Charles R Shipan, Brooke Thomas Allen et al.•Congress & the Presidency•2014

  • Avoiding Advice and Consent

    Open Access•Pamela C Corley•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2006

  • Presidential Decision Making and Minority Nominations to the U.S. Courts of Appeals

    Open Access•Mitchell Killian•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2008

  • The Contemporary Presidency

    Open Access•Gary J Andres•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2002

  • Assessing Changes in State Representation on the U.S. Courts of Appeals

    Open Access•Kevin M Scott, R Sam Garrett•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2011

  • The Pivotal and Distributive Politics of Senate‐Confirmed Appointee Vacancies

    Open Access•William G Resh, Nicholas G Napolio et al.•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2022

  • Presidential “Pitches” and White House Pressure

    Open Access•Brandon Rottinghaus, Isaiah Johnson•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2021

  • Assessing Congressional Responses to Growing Presidential Powers

    Open Access•Ryan C Black, Michael S Lynch et al.•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2011

  • Prioritizing Judicial Nominations after Presidential Transitions

    Open Access•Jonathan M King, Ian Ostrander•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2020

  • Qualifications or Philosophy? The Use of Blue Slips in a Polarized Era

    Open Access•Ryan C Black, Anthony J Madonna et al.•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2014

  • Political Context, White House Centralization, and the Timing of Presidential Nominations to the Federal Courts

    Open Access•Justin Pottle, Jon C Rogowski et al.•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2022

  • The Law

    Open Access•Aman McLeod•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2019

  • Appointment Delay and the Policy Environment of the National Transportation Safety Board

    Open Access•David C Nixon, Roisin M Bentley•Administration & Society•2006

  • A model of policy timing

    Open Access•Daniel Gibbs•American Journal of Political…•2025

  • Judicial Selection

    Open Access•Thomas Stratmann, Jared Garner•Public Choice•2004

  • Justice Bork, or, be careful which supreme court nominees you choose to fight

    Open Access•Mikel Norris•Social Science Quarterly•2024

  • Shaping the Federal Courts

    Open Access•T J Kimel, Kirk A Randazzo•Social Science Quarterly•2012

  • Predicting executive vacancies

    Open Access•Ricardo A Bello‐gomez, Amanda Rutherford•Public Administration•2021

  • Cutting in Line

    J M Box-Steffensmeier, D P Christenson et al.•The Journal of Politics•2025

  • The Role of Nominee Gender and Race at U.S. Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings

    Open Access•Christina L Boyd, Perry Mcd Collins et al.•Law & Society Review•2018

  • Party Control and Perverse Effects in Majority-Minority Districting

    Joseph Simons, Daniel J Mallinson•Statistics Politics and Policy•2015

  • Revisiting Senatorial Courtesy and the Selection of Judges to the U.S. Courts of Appeals

    Open Access•Nicholas O Howard, David A Hughes•Political Research Quarterly•2020

  • Rapid response and uncertain agendas

    Open Access•Corinne Connor, C M John S Connor et al.•Policy Studies Journal•2024

  • Congress and the Polarity Paradox

    Lawrence Cloyd Dodd, Scot Schraufnagel•Congress & the Presidency•2012

  • Taking It to the Next Level

    Open Access•Elisha Carol Savchak, Thomas G Hansford et al.•American Journal of Political…•2006

  • Representative Appointments

    Udi Sommer•Women & Politics•2013

  • Jurisdiction Stripping

    Dawn M Chutkow•The Journal of Politics•2008

  • Sounding the Fire Alarm

    Nancy Scherer, Brandon L Bartels et al.•The Journal of Politics•2008

  • Presidential Capital and the Supreme Court Confirmation Process

    Timothy R Johnson, Jason M Roberts•The Journal of Politics•2004

  • Dimensions, Issues, and Bills

    Michael H Crespin, David W Rohde•The Journal of Politics•2010

  • Reducing the Adversarial Burden on Presidential Appointees

    Open Access•Terry Sullivan•Public Administration Review•2009

  • The Timing of Presidential Nominations to the Lower Federal Courts

    Open Access•Tajuana D Massie, Thomas G Hansford et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2004

  • Elevation Potential among Circuit Court Nominees and Its Effect on the Senate’s Confirmation Behavior

    Open Access•Alex Badas•Political Research Quarterly•2020

  • Ignoring Advice and Consent? The Uses of Judicial Recess Appointments

    Open Access•Scott E Grave, Scott E Graves et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2010

  • Anchoring or Expanding? Gender and Judicial Nominations

    Open Access•Jonathan M King, Jessica A Schoenherr et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2025

  • The Politics of Requesting Appointments

    Open Access•Brandon Rottinghaus, Daniel E Bergan•Political Research Quarterly•2011

  • From Consent to Advice and Consent

    Open Access•Marcus E Hendershot•Political Research Quarterly•2010

  • The Cost of Doing Business

    Open Access•Brandon Rottinghaus, Philip Waggoner•Political Research Quarterly•2018

  • Partisan Politics

    Open Access•Lisa A Solowiej, Wendy L Martinek et al.•Party Politics•2005

  • Political Bargaining and the Timing of Congressional Appropriations

    Open Access•Jonathan Woon, Sarah Anderson et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2012

  • Communicating to the Courts and Beyond

    Open Access•Rorie L Spill Solberg, Rorie Solberg et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2004

  • The Limits of Senatorial Courtesy

    Open Access•Sarah A Binder, Sarah Binder et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2004

  • Divided We Quarrel

    Open Access•David C W Parker, Matthew Dull•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2009

  • Vacancies, vetting, and votes

    Open Access•Gary E Hollibaugh•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2015

  • Now or later? A dynamic analysis of judicial appointments

    Open Access•Jinhee Jo•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2017

  • Executive appointments

    Open Access•Fang-Yi Chiou, Fang‐yi Chiou et al.•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2014

  • Appointee vacancies in US executive branch agencies

    Open Access•William G Resh, Gary E Hollibaugh et al.•Journal of Public Policy•2021

  • No vacancy

    Open Access•Anthony Madonna, Anthony J Madonna et al.•Journal of Public Policy•2017

  • The Incompetence Trap

    Gary E Hollibaugh•Journal of Public Administration…•2016

  • Bill Passage Speed in the US House

    Andrew J Taylor•Journal of Legislative Studies•2014

  • An Opportunity Cost Theory of US Treaty Behavior

    Open Access•Judith G Kelley, Jon C W Pevehouse et al.•International Studies Quarterly•2015

  • Parliamentary Supervision of Brazilian Foreign Policy

    Open Access•Alexandre Spohr•Brazilian Political Science Review•2019

  • The Who, When, and Where of Executive Nominations

    Open Access•Gary E Hollibaugh, Lawrence S Rothenberg•American Journal of Political…•2018

  • Delaying Justice(s)

    Charles R Shipan, Megan L Shannon•American Journal of Political…•2003

  • The Logic of Collective Inaction

    Open Access•Ian Ostrander•American Journal of Political…•2016

  • Who Consents? Competing Pivots in Federal Judicial Selection

    Open Access•David Primo, David M Primo et al.•American Journal of Political…•2008

  • Beyond the Hazard Ratio

    Open Access•Jonathan Kropko, Jeffrey J Harden•British Journal of Political…•2020

  • Religion and Perceptions of Candidates' Ideologies in United States House Elections

    Open Access•Matthew L Jacobsmeier•Politics and Religion•2013

  • The Longer You Wait, the Longer It Takes

    Heather Ba, Brandon Schneider et al.•Congress & the Presidency•2022

  • Malign Neglect

    Jon R Bond, Richard Fleisher et al.•Congress & the Presidency•2009

  • InstitutionalConflict andPerceivedPropertyRights inAppointmentPolitics

    David C Nixon•Congress & the Presidency•2014

  • The Blue Slip

    Mitchel A Sollenberger•Congress & the Presidency•2010

  • The Changing Politics of Federal Judicial Nominations

    Scott Basinger, Maxwell Mak•Congress & the Presidency•2010

  • Explaining Presidential Attention to Cabinet Nominees

    Matthew Eshbaugh-Soha•Congress & the Presidency•2025

  • Obstruction and the Politics of Civilian Nominations

    Open Access•Nicholas O Howard, Jason M Roberts•American Politics Research•2020

  • Presidential Mandates and the Dynamics of Senate Advice and Consent, 1885-1996

    Open Access•Karl Derouen, Jeffrey S Peake et al.•American Politics Research•2005

  • Presidential Strategy in the Judicial Appointment Process

    Open Access•Lisa M Holmes, Lisa Holmes•American Politics Research•2007

  • Divided Government and Delay in the Legislative Process

    Open Access•Tyler Hughes, Deven Carlson•American Politics Research•2015

  • Departures From the Court

    Open Access•Kjersten R Nelson, Kjersten Nelson et al.•American Politics Research•2009

  • Federal Judges

    R H Clark, Harold W Chase•The Western Political Quarterly•1973

  • The Advice and Consent of the Senate

    Leon D Epstein, Joseph P Harris et al.•The Western Political Quarterly•1954

  • The Industrial Organization of Congress; or, Why Legislatures, Like Firms, Are Not Organized as Markets

    Barry R Weingast, William Marshall et al.•Journal of Political Economy•1988

  • Advice and Consent

    Nolan Mccarty, Rose Razaghian•American Journal of Political…•1999

  • The Supreme Court, Critical Nominations, and the Senate Confirmation Process

    P S Ruckman, P S Ruckman P S Ruckman•The Journal of Politics•1993

  • Senate Confirmation of Supreme Court Justices

    Jeffrey A Segal, Jeffrey Segal•The Journal of Politics•1987

  • Confirmation Dynamics

    Open Access•Timothy P Nokken, Brian R Sala•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2000

  • Time is of the Essence

    J M Box-Steffensmeier, Bradford Jones et al.•American Journal of Political…•1997

  • The Politics of Supreme Court Nominations

    Bryon J Moraski, Bryon Moraski et al.•American Journal of Political…•1999

  • A Spatial Model of Roll Call Voting

    Jeffrey A Segal, Charles M Cameron et al.•American Journal of Political…•1992

  • Confirmation Delay for Vacancies on the Circuit Courts of Appeals

    Open Access•David Nixon, David C Nixon et al.•American Politics Research•2001

  • Lawyers and Judges

    Erwin O Smigel, Joel B Grossman•American Sociological Review•1965

  • From Abe Fortas to Zoë Baird

    Open Access•Glen S Krutz, Glen Krutz et al.•American Political Science Review•1998

  • Observation, Context, and Sequence in the Study of Politics

    Open Access•Richard F Fenno•American Political Science Review•1986

  • Interpreting Hazard Rate Models

    Open Access•Jay D Teachman, M D Hayward•Sociological Methods & Research•1993

Unique citing works106
Citations per year4,42
Citation span2002 - 2026 (25)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedYes
Citation typesNeutral: 106
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae