Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Bureaucrats and Clientele Groups

A View from Capitol Hill

Bibliographic Data

ID6232201
AuthorsJoel D Aberbach, Bert A Rockman
Year1978
Volume22
Issue4
Pages818
Publication date1978-11-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0092-5853 • E-ISSN: 1540-5907
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2110592
OpenAlexW2323354448
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited9

Congressional fragmentation encourages and reinforces the development of tightly knit relationships between groups and federal agencies. Yet Congress also is responsible for regulating these relationships and ensuring that broader interests are represented in the administrative process. Interviews conducted with a random sample of members of the House of Representatives reveal that congressmen generally believe close administrator-clientele group relations are desirable, but that a problem of excessive influence also exists within the bureaucracy. An ordinal index combining normative and perceptual elements of congressmen's views regarding administrator-clientele links was developed. The index related consistently to congressmen's perceptions of how the political system operates, but neither consistently nor strongly to their party affiliation or ideology or to their votes on key roll calls which pit special interest claims against broader publics. We conclude that while Congress will continue to exhibit concern about group influence in the bureaucracy, it is more likely to respond by plying new interests into the administrative process than by insulating administrators from their clientele groups

Bureaucracy · Fragmentation (computing · Ideology · Interest group · Normative · Perception · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Publics · Sociology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Psychology · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research

  • Policy Spaces

    Jay D Gatrell, Jeff Worsham•Space and Polity•2002

  • Bureaucrats and Politicians

    Open Access•Joel D Aberbach, Daniel B Mezger And et al.•Australian Journal of Public…•1991

  • Membership Balance, Open Meetings, and Effectiveness in Federal Advisory Committees

    Open Access•Kevin D Karty•The American Review of Public…•2005

  • Patterns of Influence among Committees, Agencies, and Interest Groups

    Open Access•Keith E Hamm•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1983

  • A Political Consequence of Contracting

    C A Kelleher, Christa Kelleher et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2009

  • Congress, keystone of the Washington establishment

    Morris P Fiorina•Congress, keystone of the…•1977

  • Insiders and Outsiders

    Open Access•B Guy Peters•Administration & Society•1977

  • The Bureaucracy in Pressure Politics

    Open Access•J Leiper Freeman, Jo Freeman•The Annals of the American…•1958

  • The Overlapping Worlds of American Federal Executives and Congressmen

    Open Access•Joel D Aberbach, Bert A Rockman•British Journal of Political…•1977

  • Policy Innovation and Institutional Stability in Sweden

    Open Access•Francis G Castles•British Journal of Political…•1976

  • The Public Philosophy

    Open Access•Theodore J Lowi, Theodore Lowi•American Political Science Review•1967

  • Clashing Beliefs Within the Executive Branch

    Open Access•Joel D Aberbach, Bert A Rockman•American Political Science Review•1976

Citations per year0.12
Citation span1983 - 2009 (27)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae