Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Does Familiarity Breed Contempt? The Impact of Information on Mass Attitudes toward Congress

Bibliographic Data

ID6232528
AuthorsJeffery J Mondak (0000-0002-5168-2326, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign), E G Carmines (0000-0002-3935-0564, Indiana University), Robert Huckfeldt (University of California, Davis), Dona‐gene Mitchell (University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign), Scot Schraufnagel (0000-0001-5488-3070, University of Central Florida)
Year2007
Volume51
Issue1
Pages34-48
Publication date2007-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0092-5853 • E-ISSN: 1540-5907
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00235.x
OpenAlexW2079293839
LanguageEN
Citations received14
References cited17

Two features of citizen response to Congress can be taken as grounds for concern. First, Americans know relatively little about Congress, and especially about congressional procedures and policy output. Second, Congress typically emerges as the least respected political institution. Although these matters are troubling when viewed individually, more disturbing is the dilemma posed when knowledge and attitudes toward Congress are viewed in tandem. It appears that citizens who know Congress the best like Congress the least. Consequently, a sophisticated polity and a well‐respected legislature seem fundamentally incompatible. This article seeks to resolve this dilemma, contending that there is nothing about knowledge per se that leads citizens to view Congress unfavorably. Rather, differences in knowledge levels alter the considerations citizens bring to bear when evaluating Congress, with the best‐informed individuals constructing judgments on the basis of the most relevant Congress‐specific criteria while less knowledgeable citizens employ readily available but more peripheral criteria

Contempt · Dilemma · Epistemology · Legislature · Nothing · Political science · Politics · Polity · Public relations · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Public Administration · Social Media and Politics

  • Does familiarity breed contempt or liking? Comment on Reis, Maniaci, Caprariello, Eastwick, and Finkel (2011)

    Michael I Norton, Jeana H Frost et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2011

  • The Trouble with Transparency

    Open Access•Frank Bannister, Robert Connolly et al.•Policy & Internet•2011

  • Elections and the Politics of Pork in the U.S. Senate

    Open Access•Michael H Crespin, Charles J Finocchiaro•Social Science Quarterly•2013

  • Effects of public trust on behavioural intentions in the pharmaceutical sector

    Dominic H P Balog‐Way, Darrick Evensen et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2019

  • Ends versus means? Ideology and support for repeals in the mass public

    Open Access•Nathaniel A Birkhead, Jordan Ragusa et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2024

  • Linking transparency, knowledge and citizen trust in government

    Open Access•Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen•International Review of…•2012

  • Do transparent government agencies strengthen trust

    Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen•Information Polity•2009

  • Inter‐level Trust in a Multilevel Political System

    Open Access•David Karlsson•Scandinavian Political Studies•2017

  • Does Familiarity Breed Esteem? A Field Experiment on Emergent Attitudes Toward Members of Congress

    Open Access•Kevin M Esterling, William Minozzi et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2023

  • Examining the Possible Corrosive Impact of Negative Advertising on Citizens' Attitudes toward Politics

    Open Access•Robert A Jackson, Robert Jackson et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2009

  • Toward a Research Agenda on Political Misinformation and Corrective Information

    Jianing Li•Political Communication•2020

  • Do Major Policy Enactments Affect Public Evaluations of Congress? The Case of Health Care Reform

    Open Access•David R Jones•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2013

  • To Know It Is to Loath It

    Open Access•Todd Donovan, Shaun Bowler•American Politics Research•2019

  • Political knowledge, the decision calculus, and proximity voting

    Open Access•Swaran P Singh, Shane P Singh et al.•Electoral Studies•2014

  • Communication and Persuasion

    Open Access•Richard E Petty, John T Cacioppo•Communication and Persuasion•1986

  • Stealth Democracy

    Open Access•John R Hibbing, Elizabeth Theiss-Morse et al.•Stealth Democracy•2002

  • The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion

    Open Access•John R Zaller, John Zaller•Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion•1992

  • Collective Preferences in Democratic Politics

    Open Access•Scott L Althau, Scott L Althaus•Collective Preferences in…•2003

  • The Effects of General and Domain-Specific Expertise on Political Memory and Judgment

    Kathleen M Mcgraw, Neil Pinney•Social Cognition•1990

  • Reasoning and Choice

    Open Access•Paul M Sniderman, Richard A Brody et al.•Reasoning and Choice•1991

  • Congress as Public Enemy

    Open Access•John R Hibbing, Elizabeth Theiss-Morse et al.•Congress As Public Enemy•1995

  • The Shared Fortunes of Congress and Congressmen

    Richard Born, Richard T Born•The Journal of Politics•1990

  • Living Up to Expectations

    David C Kimball, Samuel C Patterson•The Journal of Politics•1997

  • Misinformation and the Currency of Democratic Citizenship

    James H Kuklinski, Paul J Quirk et al.•The Journal of Politics•2000

  • Asked and Answered

    Open Access•Jeffery J Mondak, Belinda Creel Davis•Political Behavior•2001

  • Public support for congress

    Open Access•Jack Dennis•Political Behavior•1981

  • Priming Partisan Evaluations of Congress

    Open Access•David C Kimball•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2005

  • Developing Valid Knowledge Scales

    Jeffrey J Mondak•American Journal of Political…•2001

  • Who's Responsible for the Economy? The Formation and Consequences of Responsibility Attributions

    Thomas J Rudolph, Thomas Rudolph•American Journal of Political…•2003

Unique citing works14
Citations per year0,82
Citation span2009 - 2024 (16)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 13

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae