Does public participation matter? Inclusive growth in East Asia

Dados Bibliográficos

ID6233400
AutoresBill K P Chou (Chinese University of Hong Kong, autor correspondente), Ahmed Shafiqul Huque (0000-0002-0232-4493, McMaster University)
Ano2016
Volume24
Fascículo2
Páginas163-181
Data de publicação2016-05-03
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoAsian Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0218-5377 • E-ISSN: 1750-7812
EditoraInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/02185377.2016.1164067
OpenAlexW2341831774
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas1
Referências citadas28

Inclusiveness in economic development has lately emerged as a critical factor for development. This paper adopts an analytical concept of inclusive growth to evaluate East Asia’s economic success. It contests the Western conceptualization of the critical role of public participation in development, and argues that it has played a limited role in terms of inclusive growth in East Asia. Several factors have influenced the outcome of research in this area including the choice of methodology adopted, the challenge of defining and measuring inclusive growth, and the unclear mode and impact of public participation in the process

China · Conceptualization · Development economics · East Asia · Economic growth · Economics · Inclusive development · Inclusive growth · Political science · Poverty · Public participation · Income, Poverty, and Inequality · International Development and Aid · Microfinance and Financial Inclusion · Public Administration