Active in Not Being Active (Ainba)
How East Asian powers accept R2P
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 6233746 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Sangmin Bae (0009-0008-0613-0427, Northeastern Illinois University, autor correspondente), Amy Infanzon (Northeastern Illinois University), Michael J Abbe (Northeastern Illinois University) |
| Ano | 2018 |
| Volume | 26 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 16-34 |
| Data de publicação | 2018-01-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Asian Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0218-5377 • E-ISSN: 1750-7812 |
| Editora | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/02185377.2017.1366348 |
| OpenAlex | W2772280014 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 31 |
This article explores and compares the positions of two major powers in East Asia—China and Japan—towards the 'Responsibility to Protect' (R2P) norm. R2P calls for collective international responsibility in the event that states are unwilling or unable to protect their people. Evaluating the mainstream argument in the literature that China and Japan have recently been welcoming the R2P norm, we ask the following questions: To what extent have China and Japan aligned themselves with R2P? How do international and national factors play out to influence their R2P stance? To summarize our findings up front: unlike what much of the current literature says, China and Japan's acceptance and practice of the R2P norm are largely pro forma. We argue that they both appear active in participating in the debates but only in order to remain inactive. In other words, they are active participants in the debates and discussions on R2P, but their aim is not to further its usage but to contain its effects. Their current stance on R2P is characterized by what we will call 'Active in Not Being Active' (AINBA). The article discusses the key sources and rationale for their AINBA policy with regard to R2P
Active monitoring · China · East Asia · Human rights · Political science · Responsibility to Protect · Computer Science · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Peacebuilding and International Security
Japan as a 'Normal Country'
Protection of Refugees and Displaced Persons in the Asia Pacific Region
Assessing Polemics, Principles and Practices
R2p
China's Non-Intervention Question
Approaching Chinese Freedom
The Responsibility to Protect in the Asia-Pacific Region
Japan's security policy
China and Responsibility to Protect
RtoP by increments
Japan and the Responsibility to Protect
China in Darfur
Norm antipreneurs and theorising resistance to normative change
China and the United Nations
Peace, a Contested Identity
Japan’s Dual Security Identity
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
Why does Japan downplay human rights in Southeast Asia?1
Sovereignty, Human Rights, and Responsibility
Socialisation as a Two-way Process
Global Norm Diffusion in East Asia
Libya and Syria
Doing some things' in the Xi Jinping era
Using the past to (re)write the future
The Responsibility to Protect and the problem of military intervention
The Responsibility to Protect
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |