Retrieving the Partisan History of Australian Citizenship

Bibliographic Data

ID6233900
AuthorsJudith Brett (corresponding author)
Year2001
Volume36
Issue3
Pages423-437
Publication date2001-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAustralian Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1036-1146 • E-ISSN: 1363-030X
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10361140120100631
OpenAlexW1999797079
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited14

Current debates on Australian citizenship overlook its partisan dimension. Until very recently, the term citizenship fitted more comfortably into nonlabour's discourse than into Labor's. Nonlabour's understanding of citizenship is embedded in Australia's constitutional framework. As well, in the first half of the century the term was as much moral as political, concerned not so much with the rights and entitlements which dominate contemporary understandings but with individuals' duties and obligations to their fellow citizens. For nonlabour, citizenship was linked to ideas of service and the national interest, and explicitly opposed to Labor's commitment to sectional, class-based interests. This conception of citizenship was realised in the meeting procedures of voluntary associations in which there was a clear line of implication from the government of the self through the government of the community to the government of the nation. The working man is not merely a working man, nor can all his interests be subsumed (classed) under the term Labour. The working man is and knows himself to be, the citizen of a great State. ( The Liberal 2 December 1912, 114

Citizenship · Government (linguistics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · State (computer science · Working class · Australian History and Society · Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism · Diaspora, migration, transnational identity · Law · Public Administration

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub