Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Free speech, religious freedom and vilification in Australia

Bibliographic Data

ID6234066
AuthorsKatharine Gelber (0000-0002-0239-3552, The University of Queensland, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume59
Issue1
Pages78-92
Publication date2024-01-02
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAustralian Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1036-1146 • E-ISSN: 1363-030X
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10361146.2023.2283008
OpenAlexW4388759647
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited17

In Australia, the marriage-equality plebiscite of 2017 prompted significant debate over appropriate limits to free speech in the context of expressions of religious belief. This article reports on the results of a political discourse analysis of media coverage in prominent national newspapers from 2017 to 2021. Findings show the debate was dominated by three representations: discrimination against Christians, disagreement as rights abrogation, and the meaning of 'free speech' as unbridled and unlimited. These representations were deployed in an (ultimately unsuccessful) endeavour to override long-held views about the appropriate place of freedom of speech in Australian political culture and law, and to misrepresent the meaning and purpose of vilification laws

Context (archaeology · Epistemology · Free speech · Freedom of Religion · Freedom of the press · Human rights · Meaning (existential · Newspaper · Political science · Politics · Religious freedom · Sociology · Gender and Women's Rights · History · Law · Marriage and Sexual Relationships · Philosophy · Religious Freedom and Discrimination

  • Restricting young people from digital platforms in Australia

    R Cover, J O’Neal Humphries et al.•Continuum•2025

  • Undertaking Discourse Analysis for Social Research

    Kevin Dunn, Kevin C Dunn et al.•Undertaking Discourse Analysis…•2016

  • Free Speech and Illocution

    Open Access•Jennifer Hornsby, Rae Langton•Legal Theory•1998

  • Introduction

    Paul Chilton, Christina Schaffner•Politics as Text and Talk•2002

  • The precarious protection of free speech in Australia

    Katharine Gelber•Australian Journal of Human Rights•2019

  • The bell was tolling’

    Elenie Poulos•Australian Journal of Human Rights•2020

  • Civic discourse on Facebook during the Australian same‐sex marriage postal plebiscite

    Open Access•P J Chen•Australian Journal of Social Issues•2019

  • Comparing Same-Sex Marriage in Australia and Canada

    Open Access•Carol Johnson, Manon Tremblay•Government and Opposition•2018

  • The power of belief

    Elenie Poulos•Australian Journal of Political…•2020

  • Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis

    Open Access•A Georgakopoulou•Journal of Pragmatics•2002

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae