Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Shock troops

The emerging role of Senators in House of representatives campaigns

Bibliographic Data

ID6234503
AuthorsPeter Van Onselen, Wayne Errington (Charles Sturt University)
Year2005
Volume40
Issue3
Pages357-371
Publication date2005-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAustralian Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1036-1146 • E-ISSN: 1363-030X
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10361140500203993
OpenAlexW2007826225
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited8

Since the 1949 introduction of proportional representation for the Senate there have only been two elections (1983 and 84) at which the ALP has gained more Senators in the chamber than the Coalition. The Coalition has held more seats than the ALP since 1987. The decline in Senate fortunes for the Labor Party has occurred despite (or, perhaps, because of) consecutive ALP Governments from 1972–75 and, more conspicuously, 1983–96. The professionalisation of politics through the 1980s and 1990s has dramatically changed the role major parties expect of their Senate teams. The Coalition and Labor Parties each use their Senators and Senatorial office resources as ‘shock troops’ in marginal seats, as well as points of constituency contact for electors in marginal seats or seats held by the opposition. Given that major party Senators are increasingly being used by the party machines as campaign tools, and are increasingly locating their offices and staffers in marginal seats, the numerical advantage the Coalition enjoys in the Senate is worthy of consideration. The additional campaign resources that Senators provide translates potentially into an electoral advantage in the House of Representatives for the Coalition. The Coalition's majority in the Senate may therefore be of as much interest outside the chamber as it is within it

Democracy · House of Representatives · Lower house · Opposition (politics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Proportional representation · Shock (circulatory · Sociology · Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism · Labor Movements and Unions · Law · Political Systems and Governance · Public Administration

  • The Democratic State as a Marketing Tool

    Peter Van Onselen, Wayne Errington•Commonwealth and Comparative…•2007

  • On message or out of touch? Secure web sites and political campaigning in Australia

    Ainslie Van Onselen, Peter Van Onselen•Australian Journal of Political…•2008

  • Managing midterm vacancies

    Narelle Miragliotta, Campbell Sharman•Australian Journal of Political…•2017

  • The Australian senate as a states house

    Campbell Sharman•Politics•1977

  • Australasian political studies association conference

    Lesley Caust•Australian Feminist Studies•1990

  • The Persuaders

    Peter Jackson•Representation•2005

  • Pre-parliamentary backgrounds of Australian major party MPs

    Peter Van Onselen•Journal of Legislative Studies•2004

  • Legislative recruitment to upper houses

    David M Farrell, I Mcallister•Journal of Legislative Studies•1995

  • Electoral databases

    Petervan Onselen, Wayne Errington•Australian Journal of Political…•2004

  • Parties, Governments and Pollsters

    Merrick Peisley, Ian Ward et al.•Australian Journal of Political…•2001

  • Sports Grants and the Political Pork Barrel

    Clive Gaunt•Australian Journal of Political…•1999

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,16
Citation span2007 - 2017 (11)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae