Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Sources of electoral support for the Australian democrats in the house of representatives and Senate elections of 1990 and 1993

A comparative analysis

Bibliographic Data

ID6235215
AuthorsJames Forrest (0000-0002-1103-5757, corresponding author)
Year1995
Volume30
Issue3
Pages568-580
Publication date1995-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAustralian Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1036-1146 • E-ISSN: 1363-030X
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/00323269508402357
OpenAlexW1975656129
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited10

Election to the Australian Senate under proportional voting and statewide quotas gives to minor parties of the political centre a chance to win parliamentary representation otherwise denied them in the single member constituency‐based House of Representatives. Focusing on the Australian Democrats, vote splitting in the context of • consistently higher levels of support for the Democrats in the upper house provides some evidence of differences among sources of electoral support between House and Senate, but within a context of general similarity of voter behaviour. Findings support a view that, as a party of ‘concerns’ rather than ideology, with a highly unstable support base, the future of the Democrats as other than a focus for protest must remain in doubt

Context (archaeology · Democracy · General election · Geography · House of Representatives · Ideology · Lower house · Minor (academic · Parliament · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Proportional representation · Representation (politics · Sociology · Voting · Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Public Administration · Social Media and Politics

  • State sectional and other sources of vote splitting between the house of representatives and the senate at the 1993 Australian federal elections

    James Forrest•Australian Geographer•1996

  • The pitfalls of participatory democracy

    Anika Gauja•Australian Journal of Political…•2005

  • Spatially Disaggregated Modelling of Voting Outcomes and Socio-Economic Characteristics at the 2001 Australian Federal Election

    Open Access•Robert Stimson, Robert J Stimson et al.•Geographical Research•2006

  • Place and Politics

    John Agnew, John A Agnew•Place and Politics•2014

  • Six years on

    James Forrest•Politics•1987

  • The changing structural base of Australian politics since 1946

    F Lancaster Jones, I Mcallister•Politics•1989

  • Tactical Voting in Great Britain in 1983 and 1987

    Open Access•Ron Johnston, R J Johnston et al.•British Journal of Political…•1991

  • A Test of the Importance of Tactical Voting

    Open Access•John W Galbraith, Nicol C Rae•British Journal of Political…•1989

  • A Comment on Presenting Results from Logit and Probit Models

    Trond Petersen•American Sociological Review•1985

  • Sources of electoral support for minor parties

    Open Access•Gary N Marks, Clive Bean et al.•Electoral Studies•1992

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,1
Citation span1996 - 2006 (11)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae