Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

What is the Best Strategy to Obtain Legislative Support

Survey Evidence from Brazilian State Assemblies

Bibliographic Data

ID6235580
AuthorsFelipe Nunes (0000-0001-6944-4812, University of California System, corresponding author)
Year2012
Volume6
Issue2
Pages88-113
Publication date2012-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBrazilian Political Science Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1981-3821 • E-ISSN: 1981-3821
PublisherFapUNIFESP (SciELO) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1590/s1981-38212012000200004
OpenAlexW2080923659
SCIELO_PIDS1981-38212012000200004
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited26

The legislative success of governments in Latin America has been explained by two main theories. For some authors, the main explanation involves the proactive and reactive powers of the chief executive. Other scholars argue that negotiations with deputies for portfolios and pork are the most important factors behind success in approving legislation. This paper proposes an innovative methodological strategy to test the mechanisms behind each of these theories. Original survey data of 12 Brazilian state-level assemblies is examined to assess elites' attitudes in regard to governors' strategies to obtain legislative support. Results suggest that there is not a unique equilibrium to the problem of coalition formation in multiparty settings. Deputies with concentrated constituencies, from more decentralized parties, and from conservative parties, tend to believe that the most efficient way a governor can obtain legislative support is to negotiate amendments with deputies. On the other hand, the more scattered a legislator's constituency and the more liberal or centralized his or her party, the more likely a deputy is to think that governors achieve better legislative success when they negotiate cabinet positions

Cabinet (room · Chamber of Deputies · Governor · Law and economics · Legislation · Legislator · Legislature · Negotiation · Political science · Sociology · State (computer science · Computer Science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Engineering · Law · Local Government Finance and Decentralization · Politics and Society in Latin America · Public Administration

  • Os determinantes dos resultados de soma positiva em Minas Gerais e no Rio Grande do Sul

    Open Access•Felipe Nunes•Revista de Sociologia e Política•2013

  • Multi-level legislative representation in an inchoate party system

    Open Access•Royce Carroll, Fernando Meireles•Party Politics•2024

  • Em busca da Inferência Válida

    Open Access•Julio Cesar Guimarães De Paula•Revista Brasileira de Ciência…•2018

  • The Organization of Democratic Legislatures

    Gary W Cox•The Oxford handbook of political…•2009

  • The Deadlock of Democracy in Brazil

    Barry Ames•The Deadlock of Democracy in…•2001

  • Policy, Office, or Votes?

    Open Access•Wolfgang C Mülleir, Wolfgang C Müller et al.•Policy, Office, or Votes?•1999

  • Why Parties?

    John H Aldrich•Why Parties?•1995

  • The Theory of Democracy Revisited

    Giovanni Sartori•Democracy•2016

  • Handbook of econometrics

    Michael D Intriligator, Zvi Griliches•Handbook of econometrics.•1986

  • Estimating Ideology of Brazilian Legislative Parties, 1990–2005

    Open Access•Timothy J Power, Timothy J Power Timothy J Power et al.•Latin American Research Review•2009

  • Minority government and majority rule

    Steven M Delue•History of European Ideas•1991

  • The Industrial Organization of Congress; or, Why Legislatures, Like Firms, Are Not Organized as Markets

    Barry R Weingast, William Marshall et al.•Journal of Political Economy•1988

  • Ideology or What? Legislative Behavior in Multiparty Presidential Settings

    Cesar Zucco•The Journal of Politics•2009

  • The Executive Toolbox

    Open Access•Eric D Raile, Carlos Pereira et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2011

  • The Politics of Coalition Formation and Survival in Multiparty Presidential Democracies

    Open Access•David Altman•Party Politics•2000

  • The Cost of Governing

    Open Access•Carlos Pereira, Bernardo Mueller•Comparative Political Studies•2004

  • The Presidential Calculus

    Open Access•Octavio Amorim Neto•Comparative Political Studies•2006

  • Government Coalitions and Legislative Success Under Presidentialism and Parliamentarism

    Open Access•José Antônio Cheibub, Adam Przeworski et al.•British Journal of Political…•2004

  • Modeling Electoral Coordination

    Open Access•Inés Levin, Gregory Katz•Journal of Politics in Latin…•2011

  • Political Parties and Government Coalitions in the Americas

    Open Access•Eduardo Alemán, George Tsebelis•Journal of Politics in Latin…•2011

  • The Inefficient Secret Revisited

    Open Access•Octavio Amorim Neto, Fabiano Santos•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2003

  • Determinantes do comportamento particularista de legisladores estaduais brasileiros

    Open Access•Mônica Mata Machado De Castro, Fátima Anastasia et al.•Dados•2009

  • O segredo ineficiente revisto

    Open Access•Octavio Amorim Neto, Fabiano Santos•Dados•2003

  • Electoral Institutions and the Politics of Coalitions

    Open Access•Trine Iversen, Torben Iversen et al.•American Political Science Review•2006

  • A democracia no Brasil

    Open Access•Fernando Limongi•Novos Estudos - CEBRAP•2006

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,23
Citation span2013 - 2024 (12)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae