Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Polite Passionate Persuasion

Hume's Conception of Rhetoric

Bibliographic Data

ID6236069
AuthorsMarc Hanvelt (Carleton University, corresponding author)
Year2010
Volume43
Issue3
Pages565-581
Publication date2010-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCanadian Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0008-4239 • E-ISSN: 1744-9324
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0008423910000636
OpenAlexW2153997744
LanguageEN
References cited17

While confronting questions about the negative political effects of faction and fanaticism, David Hume developed a distinction between the manipulative rhetoric of the fanatics and the factional leaders and a good form of rhetoric that I term accurate, just, and polite. This high form of rhetoric combines Hume's philosophy of just reasoning with the rhetorical style of an idealized Demosthenes and eighteenth-century standards of politeness. Understanding Hume's conception of rhetoric is important for understanding the full scope of his political philosophy. In addition, further study of his conception of rhetoric could provide a valuable avenue of research for contemporary liberal theorists seeking to develop normative models of judgment and deliberation.Résumé.En réfléchissant aux effets négatifs du factionnalisme et du fanatatisme, David Hume a établi une distinction entre la rhétorique manipulatrice des leaders factionnaires et fanatiques, et une rhétorique que je qualifie ici de correcte, juste et polie. Cette dernière s'inspire de la philosophie du juste raisonnement de Hume, mais aussi d'un style de rhétorique associé à Demosthenes, érigé ici en idéal, ainsi que des standards de politesse du dix-huitième siècle. Cette conception de la rhétorique joue un rôle important dans la philosophie politique de Hume et pourrait constituer une avenue de recherche intéressante pour les penseurs libéraux contemporains qui cherchent à développer des modèles normatifs de jugement et de délibération

Art · Epistemology · Humanities · Linguistics · Literature · Persuasion · Politeness · Political science · Politics · Rhetoric · Rhetorical question · Style (visual arts · Theology · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law · Philosophy · Political Theory and Influence · Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education

  • A Progress of Sentiments

    Annette Baier•A Progress of Sentiments•1991

  • Shaftesbury and the Culture of Politeness

    Open Access•Lawrence E Klein•Shaftesbury and the Culture of…•1994

  • Civil Passions

    Sharon R Krause•Civil Passions•2008

  • The Fate of Eloquence in the Age of Hume

    Adam Potkay•The Fate of Eloquence in the Age…•2019

  • Virtue, Commerce, and History

    Open Access•J G A Pocock•Virtue, Commerce, and History•1985

  • Cicero

    Cicero Marcus Tullius Cicero, Cicero [Marcus Tullius Cicero] et al.•Cicero•2001

  • Cognition and Commibnent in Hume’s Philosophy

    Don Garrett•Cognition and commitment in…•1997

  • New Letters of David Hume

    David Hume, Richard Davenport et al.•New letters of David Hume•1954

  • David Hume

    David Hume, P H Nidditch•Enquiries concerning human…•1975

  • Cognition and Commitment in Hume's Philosophy

    Don Garrett•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1997

  • Order and Artifice in Hume's Political Philosophy

    Frederick J Whelan•Order and Artifice in Hume's…•2017

  • The Suasive Art of David Hume

    M A Box•Princeton University Press eBooks•1990

  • Between Facts and Norms

    Jürgen Habermas•Between Facts and Norms•1996

  • Dialogues concerning Natural Religion

    David Hume•1779

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae